55
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] GoobyMcMooby@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 month ago

I think it’s about time the press and protesters start showing up strapped. These people clearly don’t have any fear and are just power tripping on people for simply being there. Put the fear of God back into these pigs.

[-] mean_bean279@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

The people of sh.it.just.works and Lemmy.world both loved to try and act like I was out of line for calling for open carry the other night. Unfortunately California state law doesn’t allow for it. I think that it’s the only way to get them to back off with the Marines, the National Guard and with ICE though. If they’re not going to be afraid of us then they’re never going to change and the people saying “don’t give them a reason to escalate” will keep saying that up to the first battles at which point they’ll run and cower.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Fun fact, the real wave of gun restrictions started with the Black Panthers open carrying in California back in in the 60s.

https://www.history.com/articles/black-panthers-gun-control-nra-support-mulford-act

That led to the Mulford Act:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mulford_Act

[-] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 2 points 1 month ago

I hope Newsom puts forward legislation to eliminate the Mulford Act. That would give the Neoconfederates serious pause.

[-] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

The state law made by fucking Reagan and should thusly be ignored.

[-] mean_bean279@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Completely agree. We should have gotten rid of the law. It was born out of racism and restricts our rights in Cali.

[-] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago

Escalation to violence is exactly what they want. It gives them all the justification they need to invoke the Insurrection Act, declare martial law and suspend your Constitutional rights. And not just in California.

[-] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 1 points 1 month ago

Californians have a right to defend themselves

[-] mean_bean279@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Where does the goal post moving stop? It’s not an escalation of violence if you don’t use it. It’s a threat to escalate to violence. If they aren’t afraid of you then they’re not going to change.

When they declare martial law are you going to be saying the same thing and hoping by just chanting loudly you change their mind?

[-] ArchmageAzor@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Problem is the situation won't improve without an escalation

[-] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 month ago

No. The problem is, the situation will only get worse with escalation. Not better.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

We had six months without protests. The administration seemed happy to escalate in their absence.

What if these protests aren't what's driving public policy? What if the problem is the administration itself and not the people reacting to the violence they're inflicting on the locals?

And ask yourself this. If ICE came into your city, what kind of community would you want to live in? One where your neighbors took to the streets to shut down the police convoys and scare off these thugs? Or one where friendly neighbors locked their doors and hid, while reactionary neighbors singled you out for the police to grab?

[-] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 month ago

I'm not opposed to protests...the LA protests in particular. I'm opposed to violent confrontations with Trump's thugs. I'm opposed to citizens being the ones to escalate the situation. Trump already wants this. All I'm saying is don't give him what he wants. Let them be the ones to escalate. We all know it's coming...so why give him the satisfaction of making him look justified?

Don't just hand him an excuse. Stare them straight in the eyes, and make them take it. That's what protesting is all about. Your defiance is not about hitting back...it's about taking a hit, and standing up again. Make them look like the bullies they are. Don't legitimize their excuses. Prove that they're hollow.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

I’m opposed to citizens being the ones to escalate the situation.

"Stop resisting! Stop resisting!"

Don’t just hand him an excuse.

The excuse was the existence of Hispanic people in Paramount, California. Everything that followed was a consequence of Trump's bigoted pogrom against Latinos.

Make them look like the bullies they are.

They already do. But slapping the "bully" bumper sticker on an ICE truck full of your neighbors does nothing to get them out of that truck.

What the people of LA are doing is so much more than optics. They are actively saving lives and guarding their friends and neighbors from police violence.

They are resisting in the most material and direct way anyone can ask.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Escalation to violence is exactly what they want.

Are you sure? It seems like the escalation is what they don't want. And that's why they're having to call in the marines to try and scare people back into submission.

Passive acquiescence and blind obedience is what they want. That's why the news media is so eager to label these protests as abnormal, intolerable, and anti-American. If the conservatives wanted protests, they wouldn't be so eager to censor the protests' advocates and so worried about valorizing these opposition efforts.

[-] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 0 points 1 month ago

So what? Do you just watch until you're being herded into concentration camps anyway? This is the first instance of effective resistance to Trump (the April parades don't count) since January and they're calling in the Marines already. This was simply never going to end peacefully, because any effective act of mass resistance was going to be suppressed violently; avoiding escalation means avoiding resistance.

Edit: This person is not arguing in good faith. I cornered them in this thread and they claimed that ICE won't shoot people unless provoked and then that they're shooting people to provoke an escalation. Their argument seems to hinge on the idea that rubber bullets are harmless pranks you should just suck up.

[-] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 month ago

Resistance doesn't have to include escalation. Leave that to them...they are going to escalate anyway. If the protesters are the ones doing it, then they just handed Trump exactly what he wants...a legal justification for his actions.

[-] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 1 points 1 month ago

Neither Trump nor his followers give a flying fuck about legal justifications, and any so-called moderate who cares about that is a fascist in denial. Solidarity is indispensible when fighting tyranny, and solidarity demands that when members of your community are being kidnapped by the Gestapo you fight back, not watch and cry about legal justifications.

[-] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca -1 points 1 month ago

Man, I would love to be as delusional as you are. It must be so much fun thinking life is like a video game.

[-] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 1 points 1 month ago

Look, if your strategy and tactics prevent you from protecting your own neighbors you've already lost the plot.

[-] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago

How does getting your neighbors killed, "protect" them? Those people are already doing enough to protect their neighbors right now. How would starting an all-out civil war, protect anyone?

[-] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 1 points 1 month ago

Those people are already doing enough to protect their neighbors right now.

My point is that continuing that is the escalation you're talking about. Consider the following situation: ICE comes for person X and group Y shows up. Y refuse to hand over X, at which point ICE threatens to shoot them if they don't comply. What should Y do here? Hand over X? Peacefully get shot? Shoot back?

[-] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 month ago

Like I said...you are delusional.

If ICE shows up for person X, and group Y stands in front of them....ICE is not going to start shooting people unless they are threatened with violence. If the entire neighborhood comes out onto the streets in enough numbers, and simply stands their ground...ICE will have no choice but to either leave, or break the law.

But, if you step up to them with violent intent...then all bets are off, and your fantasy scenario comes true. So, if that's what you want to see happen...then go ahead. FAFO. Because as much as you might like to imagine you can take on the US military with your home stash of guns...you don't have enough ammo to "save your neighbors" from that level of stupidity. All you're going to do is get a lot of people killed, and accomplish exactly nothing.

[-] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 2 points 1 month ago

ICE is not going to start shooting people unless they are threatened with violence.

You do realize they're shooting protesters right as we speak right? That's literally why we're having this conversation.

[-] Jerkface@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Protesters urged not to give trump administration pretext for what it is already doing

edit: Oh, what the hell. Let's add a snippet.

Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass publicly urged protesters Monday not to give the Trump administration any pretext for what they’re already doing and will keep doing no matter what. “Angelenos—don’t engage in violence and give the administration an excuse to inflict all the damage they have been inflicting carte blanche for months on end,” said Bass, adding that Trump and his team are just looking for a reason to respond with violence, as they would have done whether or not any of this happened.

[-] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 month ago

That's an Onion article. You can tell because Trump hasn't been shooting protesters for months already. That's what comes next. And that's when it stops being a protest, and turns into a civil war.

Don't be so eager to make that happen.

[-] Almacca@aussie.zone 0 points 1 month ago

It's looking pretty inevitable at this point.

[-] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 month ago

Only if people go into this looking for it.

[-] Almacca@aussie.zone 1 points 1 month ago

You mean like the Trump administration?

[-] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

He's already ordered soldiers in, who have shot journalists and protestors

[-] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 month ago

There is a massive difference between rubber bullets and live ammunition.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

There's a marginal difference. "Less lethal" rounds are still lethal when they're fired directly at people, particularly if the wounded are denied medical attention and are subjected to further police violence after they've been injured.

[-] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca -1 points 1 month ago

Dude...that is a massive difference.

[-] superniceperson@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

You're not wrong but you're on the wrong instance if your solution isn't just 'hold hands and vote for black trump with a d next to their name next election'.

[-] 0ndead@infosec.pub 0 points 1 month ago
[-] fedupwithbureaucracy@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Tell me how every dictatorship has been overthrown. I’ll give you a hint: those that chastize calls for retaliation tend to be labeled “fascist sympathizers” by history.

[-] deranger@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

Uncomfortable truth: violence has solved some of the largest issues across the history of humanity.

[-] untakenusername@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago

yeah its also created some of the biggest problems

all wars, all genocides ect, that's pretty bad stuff

[-] deranger@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Violence didn’t create war or genocide, those are a result of nationalism and racism, respectively. Violence is the means used to accomplish the goal, but the motivation is what does the creating.

To be clear I’m not pro-violence or something, but it is kinda funny to me when you hear “violence is the answer” and open a history book to see time and time again that violence is the answer for quite a few problems.

this post was submitted on 09 Jun 2025
55 points (100.0% liked)

politics

24778 readers
1354 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS