77
submitted 2 days ago by Medic8teMe@lemmy.ca to c/canada@lemmy.ca
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works 16 points 2 days ago

The official stressed that police have to believe there are reasons to suspect that the information in question will assist in a criminal investigation, and said there is a mechanism in the bill allowing service providers to apply for judicial review if they are not comfortable handing over information.

But there are also legal consequences for those who don't comply, including thousands of dollars in fines and possible jail time.

You know exactly what will happen 100% of the time, right?

Time for us to start marching on Ottawa and shut this shit down ... 'cause once it passes it'll have to be challenged in the SCoC to stop it.

[-] GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca 11 points 2 days ago

I love that shitty waffle-talk.

The official stressed that police have to believe there are reasons to suspect that the information in question will assist in a criminal investigation

Cool, so get a warrant, it should be a snap.

this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2025
77 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

9965 readers
574 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS