256
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] truthfultemporarily@feddit.org 10 points 1 month ago

The difference is that if something is proven mathematically it's 100% certain and will not change. In other sciences you may be taught things that later turn out to be flat out wrong.

[-] QuoVadisHomines@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 month ago

Bingo, I was taught in genetics class in the 1990s that RNA played a role but DNA was the primary driver and now my understanding is the current consensus is RNA is the primary driver.

[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

When I was growing up, Minnie was the primary Driver, but now the consensus says that it's Adam.

[-] HellieSkellie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 month ago

Not here to start shit, genuinely curious what people think about Gödel's incompleteness theorems in relation to us being able to "know" math

[-] truthfultemporarily@feddit.org 4 points 1 month ago

Not a mathematician but the way I understand it, is that it merely shows that there are unprovable problems, not that nothing can be proven.

[-] yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 month ago

Not if it's later shown that your set of axioms lead to a contradiction.

In that case have fun re-proofing everything with new axioms.

this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2025
256 points (98.5% liked)

memes

16608 readers
930 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS