submitted 16 hours ago by dodgeflailimpose@lemmy.zip to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

53 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Just listened to Naomi Brockwell talk about how AI is basically the perfect surveillance tool now.

Her take is very interesting: what if we could actually use AI against that?

Like instead of trying to stay hidden (which honestly feels impossible these days), what if AI could generate tons of fake, realistic data about us? Flood the system with so much artificial nonsense that our real profiles basically disappear in the noise.

Imagine thousands of AI versions of me browsing random sites, faking interests, triggering ads, making fake patterns. Wouldn’t that mess with the profiling systems?

How could this be achieved?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] HelloRoot@lemy.lol 5 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

getting irrelevant ads

you guys are getting ads?

[-] edel@lemmy.ml 2 points 13 hours ago

My entire family is ad free for years... with the exception in podcasts. I am tempted to block them too (is there a way now?) but still not too intrusive... it is a way for me to keep connected to the ad world anyways. Now, the moment they abuse them here tii... I'll find a way to block these.

[-] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 2 points 14 hours ago

I’m not, but OP would if they started opening up their IP and fingerprints to anyone who wants them, in order to inundate those parties with garbage data. Admittedly, I might be missing some clever part of their plan.

[-] blackbrook@mander.xyz 4 points 14 hours ago

Getting more targeted ads is not really in your interest. That is an idea promoted by the ad people.

[-] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 0 points 13 hours ago

I’m not seeing the relevance of your comment

[-] blackbrook@mander.xyz 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

You said

you would probably end up degrading your own experience; getting irrelevant ads

Irrevant ads = less targeted ads. You seem to think this is a negative. I'm saying it is actually a positive.

[-] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 hours ago

Taken by themselves, yes you are correct. Less targeted is a positive. I would rather just not have the ads, which is where I am at now. So I don’t understand why I would give that up, which is what the OP’s strategy would seem to require.

[-] dodgeflailimpose@lemmy.zip 2 points 13 hours ago

No clever plan. Just picked up this idea and like to see different opinions from people maybe far more advanced in that field

this post was submitted on 29 Jun 2025

86 points (89.8% liked)

Privacy

39217 readers

859 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
Don't promote proprietary software
Try to keep things on topic
If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
Be nice :)

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS