116
submitted 1 day ago by Zerush@lemmy.ml to c/privacy@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 0 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

No one was talking about openness, we were talking about data collection.

The only way to ensure no data collection is to run locally, which requires openness.

You're comparing online models with local models.

Correct

Local OpenAI models are also private.

They don't exist, and privacy cannot be guaranteed.

Good thing no one said that. It's not just America either.

So you do think that.

Most countries are significantly more free than China (and Russia and North Korea),

The word used was "worse" which is highly subjective.

and if you don't believe that, you need to open your eyes.

Residents of "the land of the free" don't understand irony.

[-] Ulrich@feddit.org 1 points 13 hours ago

Okay at this point its pretty clear you have no intention of good faith discussion and want to constantly redirect the conversation to a strawman argument so I'm going to bail.

[-] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 0 points 13 hours ago

Dude, you are the one inserting words like "freedom" trying to slide the conversation.

China is not worse , principally because worse is unmeasurable.

this post was submitted on 28 Jun 2025
116 points (97.5% liked)

Privacy

39217 readers
859 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS