223
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by Gemini24601@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

Bill Gates and Linus Torvalds have apparently never met in person before, despite their pseudo-rivalry.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz 46 points 1 month ago

Top comment on that page is perfect:

One wrote their own operating system incorporating others ideas on operating systems, the other's mom bought theirs.

[-] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 16 points 1 month ago

Mommy was one of the higher ups at IBM. Gates got most of it just handed to him. They are not the same.

[-] fubarx@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

I know it's fun to bash on Gates, but it's also bullshit. Dave Cutler worked on at least two major operating systems. He's way up there in the Hall of Fame.

[-] whimsy@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 month ago

Torvalds wrote the kernel, not the operating system. It's a part of the GNU/Linux OS ;)

[-] SorryQuick@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 month ago
[-] whimsy@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 month ago

Is it, though? I don't know about you, but most (if not all) of my interactions with my computer are at levels above the kernel

[-] SorryQuick@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 month ago

Then where do you draw the line?

The vast majority of people also don’t interact with the GNU tools at all, so GNU/Linux isn’t the OS either. KDE would be, or perhaps the distro itself. I’m not sure I’d call the OS GNU/Linux/Ubuntu/KDE. At that point might as well throw in firefox, for many it’s pretty much all the interaction they have with the computer.

Or what about the distros that don’t use the GNU coreutils? They are generally still called linux and still get to run apps made for linux, even with no traces of GNU.

[-] whimsy@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 month ago

I made that comment in slight jest. But anyway using non GNU OS still is consistent with my viewpoint that you don't operate the kernel per se. The kernel sits at a layer below what the user operates.

As for the argument of apps being made for Linux, it is nothing more than just a semantic shortcut to the common ground between all these independent OS

[-] SorryQuick@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago

Of course you don’t operate the kernel, but the kernel operates the system.

My point is that there are many layers between the kernel and user and which you interact with depends on the person. The only common point between all these, at least for linux, is the linux kernel itself.

I get that the “axchually GNU/linux” is just a joke, but considering how much impact linux has versus GNU, it’s totally fine to omit it. You can totally just use busybox instead and you’re still using a Linux OS.

this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2025
223 points (97.0% liked)

Technology

74135 readers
1498 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS