67
submitted 3 days ago by Pro@programming.dev to c/science@mander.xyz
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] BrotherL0v3@lemmy.world 18 points 3 days ago

Holy shit, I am totally guilty of this.

For those who haven't yet read the article, the idea is that people interpret "80% of people prefer Pepsi Max to Coke" as "Pepsi Max is 80% yummier than Coke", when in reality most of that 80% only slightly prefers Pepsi.

Basically a strong difference in proportion of people who prefer one option to another does not necessarily imply a strong difference in the average opinion between the two.

[-] ech@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Same thing with RottenTomatoes ratings. A fresh rating just means the reviewer thought it wasn't terrible, and the "freshness" rating really doesn't say anything about the actual quality of the movie.

load more comments (3 replies)
this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2025
67 points (94.7% liked)

Science

4883 readers
63 users here now

General discussions about "science" itself

Be sure to also check out these other Fediverse science communities:

https://lemmy.ml/c/science

https://beehaw.org/c/science

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS