77
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 16 Jul 2025
77 points (97.5% liked)
Games
20563 readers
402 users here now
Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)
Posts.
- News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
- Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
- No humor/memes etc..
- No affiliate links
- No advertising.
- No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
- No self promotion.
- No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
- No politics.
Comments.
- No personal attacks.
- Obey instance rules.
- No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
- Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.
My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.
Other communities:
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
It is still very funny to me that Ai image generators don’t get how human hands work.
That's actually a bit of a mislead. Most AI software has hand correction built into models now so they get it right more than they don't. We've all just associated bad hands with AI so the easiest way to get the wanted response is to make bad hands. If those images are AI generated, I'd bet "bad hands, too many fingers" were in the prompt.
They do now. Its just that the older models are still prevalent for various reasons.
They've been able to generate hands for years now. AI image and text generation has basically passed the Turing test at this point. Any media you consume could have been entirely AI generated. That's the main reason I avoid talking about how AI slop is necessarily technically inferior to anything a human made. It's possible for it to make high quality shit, and that doesn't make it okay to use