282
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] jaybone@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 week ago

Why did they historically not go further east?

[-] LilB0kChoy@midwest.social 12 points 1 week ago

They did, at least into Minnesota. This range map probably doesn't use data from as long ago as when they did.

[-] jaybone@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 week ago

I was definitely thinking the time (and method) of this data collection. It kind of appears to reflect US western expansion.

[-] altasshet@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 week ago

Pure guess, but the praries are probably not a good habitat for them. Hard for them to hunt, and the buffalos could easily mess them up.

[-] jaybone@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 week ago

Yeah trees and mountains make sense. Like the Sierra range in California / Nevada. Or the Rockies. But that map shows way down into Mexico where I imagine it is pretty flat and trees are not as dense (which i guess is kind of similar to a prairie?) Interesting point on the buffalo, i can see that.

this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2025
282 points (99.0% liked)

Map Enthusiasts

4812 readers
14 users here now

For the map enthused!

Rules:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS