-9
US could run out of missiles in eight days
(en.mehrnews.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 18 Jul 2025
-9 points (39.0% liked)
United States | News & Politics
8303 readers
492 users here now
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
Again, put up or shut up. Find a source that says the Iranian government is anything but a propaganda source. It's cool, I can wait.
You are a joke
And yet nobody has responded with any site saying Iranian state media is sooooo honest and reliable.
Gee... wonder why that is? LOL.
"Give me sources for your sources" lol no, that's an extremely stupid thing to expect and a blatant double standard, if you put half that much effort into fact checking western media you'd know better already
You tried to claim the BBC isn't state owned by just typing it in all caps and getting cranky, shut the fuck up.
And multiple people linked you Douglas MacGregor verifying this story, you just ignored them because you're a dishonest little Zionist toad.
"All my friends agree" weak, try harder
What does that even mean? The Iranian government is a government. By definition it's more than just a "propaganda source".
News from the Iranian government is, de facto, propaganda. They aren't going to tell the truth about themselves or their enemies.
Funny how you never feel that way about western state media. Or private western propaganda outlets. You only care when someone disagrees with your pre existing beliefs.
Oh, no, I regularly remove trash blog nonsense from Blogspot and Substack all the time. Fox/OANN are right out, so are the British tabloids.
Junk sites are junk sites regardless of hemisphere. But that's not what we're talking about here, we're talking about state sponsored bullshit sites.
I said Western state media, why the fuck are you talking about Blogspot or Substack or British Tabloid you dishonest fuck?
Oy, shithead, you were the one trying to shift away from state media.
Oh look at that, non of the junk propaganda outlets that align with your ideology are included, those are all given a special parse. It's only the ones that oppose you.
No, there are sites that oppose me that are perfectly fine because they don't engage in bullshit.
National Review is kind of the gold standard when it comes to conservative reporting, I don't AGREE with them, but they aren't removable the way the bullshit sites are.
https://www.nationalreview.com/
(Bonus - not state owned media either, but I don't think William F. Buckley Jr. would recognize the current government as either Conservative or Republican, he would be horrified at what's become of his party.)
Oh yeah, I'm sure the racist McCarthyist religious extremist would be horrified...
I think it's less that and more the conservative financial angle. If somebody told him the Republican party would be cheering a plan that adds $3 to $6 trillion in debt, he'd be apoplectic, if he didn't just outright die on the spot.
Those kinds of numbers would be just alien to his generation of conservatives.
What the fuck are you talking about? Are you completely ignorant of American history or are you just lying?
Knowing you, I'm assuming the latter.
Argumentum ad populum, suck it dry
Lol. The only example of a site you disagree with that you will allow is one that's just a very slightly different flavor of western chauvinist neo-liberal? Are you fucking serious?
Like, mate, this is just a straight up admition that you don't accept anything that seriously opposes you. (And you've already admitted that you'll happily slurp down sources that absolutely do engage in bullshit so long as they agree with you, including National Review.)
A literal CIA agent...
No, that's you talking about any media opposed to the west.
Argumentum ad populum, suck it dry
They do though, it's just bullshit that you're hypocritical ass finds closer to what you agree with, so you give it a pass.
Yeah, you agree with one of them and not the other, which is the only standard you have. Because you a hypocritical toad.
Damn, you're really just running odwn the list of zionist shitheel stick replies; we've go the "you're blind", we've got the fake quote that I didn't say, we've got the grossly homophobic remark about Putin, we've got "but you're from .ml!": It's a Zionist bingo in one line!
Great how if you look at the ban reasons, most of them are clearly salty .world powermods like mass banning me from all of the coms they moderate. I love that there's a series of literally five bans from the same mod with the same message saying that their users were making so many false reports that it was easier just to ban me than to deal with them.
Argumentum ad populum, suck it dry