328
submitted 1 week ago by alessandro@lemmy.ca to c/pcgaming@lemmy.ca
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Finding funding for those indies is another matter.

Other than that, Mrs. Lincoln, how was the show?

I will say, I know a guy with a ton of extra cash who could probably practice what he preaches.

But finding the next digital unicorn in a sea of mid-to-shit titles is no mean feat. For every Warcraft or Marathon there's a thousand flops.

That is, I think, what makes the AAA studios look worse than they have a right to be. They're Frankenstein companies, cobbled together from the bits of a dozen early stars. But that doesn't guarantee hits, it just guarantees brand recognition. The latest Blizzard title isn't going to have the secret sauce of StarCraft because they already made that game once. Merging with Activision doesn't mean making a game that's better than CoD and StarCraft combined.

this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2025
328 points (99.1% liked)

PC Gaming

11889 readers
466 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS