151
China Shuts Down OnlyFans, Calls It a Threat to National Morals and Social Order
(thedailyguardian.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 23 Jul 2025
151 points (99.3% liked)
news
24213 readers
586 users here now
Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.
Rules:
-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --
-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --
-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --
-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --
-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--
-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--
-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --
-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
It's not all the time, but every time there is a discussion about porn, or porn adjacent topics, their opinion has rubbed me the wrong way, I honestly don't know why I was being especially harsh here. I guess I just find it annoying when I see something I've interpreted as "reddit gooner brain" where porn is this special thing above criticism or analysis and is actually great and good. And they've tried to dismiss arguments people are making in the past by claiming they are acting like "christian fundamentalists" or making claims like "all studies showing porn is bad are just funded by christian groups." Just very much shutting down discussion and not willing to hear out people who do have legitimate problems with a very problematic industry. Which is why I came in so aggressively I guess. I'm not going to pretend I was making a strong point here, I was just venting about frustrations I didn't even know I had towards this user.
that's fair thanks for answering, please don't get mad at me but if i had the power your original comment would be a tagline just because of how 0-100 it is and every time i read it i imagine you're replying to some sex-pest gooner hexbear who does post about porn & christian fundamentalists a lot but isn't banned lmao - a sitcom-esque sexpest poster that everyone just shits on if you would
It was probably way too much, I'll keep it up though, since it makes people laugh (even if they're laughing at how unnecessarily outraged I was over nothing).