143
submitted 4 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) by Rooskie91@discuss.online to c/showerthoughts@lemmy.world

Even if we take into consideration that 90% (out of 25) could be lying (they aren't), that's still ~3 women he assaulted.

Edit: Damn y'all, thanks for that old internet feeling I keep coming back to Lemmy for. Not a girl in sight in these comments.

Is testifying under oath not considered evidence? There have been so many credible lawsuits against this guy for sexual assault. Honestly what are these files going to prove that we don't already have plenty of evidence for?

And lastly, do you have any idea what going after a rich powerful man for sexually assaulting you does to your life? Why the fuck would anybody put themselves through that if they weren't absolutely sure they had a credible case? Some of the plaintiffs in these cases had their lives and their family's lives threatened and disrupted.

Welp, to the bottom with me I suppose.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] YarrMatey@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 3 weeks ago

Lemmy is mostly men, it is hard to share any other perspective. SA is hard to get a conviction in. If there isn't physical evidence like semen, then the victim is called a liar. If there is semen evidence, then the victim is called someone who regretted their choice and is now getting back at the person. (And this is assuming the perpetrator was male, there can be female perpetrators too). A lot of victims do not come forward about what happened because they don't want to be called a liar and labeled a pariah publicly. The absolute shame and rejection when someone doesn't believe you. This subject is pretty sensitive to me and lemmy just really, really disappoints sometimes.

[-] Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 3 weeks ago

SA is hard to get a conviction in.

Yeah. It turns out that something that usually has no witnesses beyond the accused and accuser, often has little or no evidence other than the accusation itself and the sole difference between it and an otherwise common and legal act exists solely in the mind of the accuser is difficult to prove beyond a reasonable doubt.

[-] YarrMatey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 weeks ago

Not sure if you were just reiterating, but yes it is depressing. It takes bravery to step forward knowing that it can cause further damage to oneself. Not just socially but mentally. I don't have a perfect solution to this. But when the perpetrator is Trump, I doubt justice is going to happen.

[-] 0x0@lemmy.zip 0 points 3 weeks ago

solely in the mind of the accuser

Wait what? Ever heard of consent? No is no? Coercion? The most common definition of rape?
There's a huge grey area between people having consensual sex and rape, but rape is not in said gray area.

[-] Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 3 weeks ago

The distinction between rape and sex is consent. Whether a given sex act is consensual or not exists only in the minds of those involved in it (consent is a mental state, not something directly observable from outside), unless communicated and when communicated only the communication exists which is likely not in any fixed form.

[-] GaMEChld@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Questions:

  1. Would you be ok with you or someone you love more than yourself being sent to prison on a false accusation as long as a larger number of guilty people also get imprisoned?

  2. Do you think false accusations don't happen?

I generally take people at their word in my day to day interactions. I'd believe you if you told me something. But I wouldn't enforce laws on people with only eyewitness testimony. Eyewitness testimony has been proven unreliable.

[-] YarrMatey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 weeks ago

I get that men are terrified about false rape accusations, even though there is an extremely low chance of it happening, they are afraid. When someone talks about sexual assault, in their mind they feel they need to defend themselves by bringing up false accusations because in their mind it will discourage this crime, bring light to real victims, and thus protect themselves. I'm not a man but this is what I've been told. Then you have victims, who simply want their rapist and other rapists to face justice. They often know others around them who have also been sexually assaulted. When they talk about sexual assault and someone else brings up false accusations, it feels like they don't actually care about the victims and just want to soapbox about false accusations, stealing the spotlight. They might even be a toxic part of the manosphere.

The nature of the crime means it is usually the victim and the perpetrator alone and not in public, and the victim is more likely to know who the assaulter is. It can be a family member, friend, partner, etc. There usually isn't much evidence to prove sexual assault. So we have a problem. As you said, you don't believe a hefty amount of these sexual assaults should have laws enforced on them. I don't have a solution, other than a suggestion that people should be more empathetic towards victims. And not ask questions like yours to victims.

questions like these are unproductive

  1. How many rapists are you ok with letting go free so that you or someone you know doesn't have to go to prison for something they didn't do? 1,000? 10,000? Every single rapist? Is it better to let every single criminal go free so that you do not have to go to prison?

  2. Do you think rape/sexual assault don't happen?

[-] Amir@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 weeks ago

Is it better to let every single criminal go free so that you do not have to go to prison?

While that is a wild example that will never happen, I'm not a martyr nor planning/wanting to be one, so likely yes, I'd sacrifice a whole lot to protect my own life and willing to bet many others would too if they had to make that choice.

For most, there's no point in making the world a better place by sacrificing your own life, because you won't be around to see it. Yes, something about planting a tree whose shade you'll never sit in...

[-] Kalcifer@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 weeks ago

Lemmy is mostly men […]

Has there been a recent survey?

[-] Aeri@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago

I identify as a woman and the "The internet is literally all men anyone who says they're a woman is a liar" thing is really demoralizing.

[-] YarrMatey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 weeks ago

My first experiences on the internet were riddled with misogyny. As a child, I was told I am lying about being a girl and didn't sound like one. I had many guys tell me "tits or gtfo" when learning I'm a girl, usually after they asked me if I was a girl. I tried playing some multiplayer team games online and was hazed once they found out I was a girl, multiple times. I refuse to play those games now. Even as an adult, I've had gamer guys think I'm great until they learn I'm a feminist, then the hate comes back. I've dated an adult man who belittled me for playing Sims because people with real lives play games like Overwatch. At least mainstream media felt like there were more women around, lemmy just feels more centered for men :/

[-] Aeri@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

Don't take shit from anyone who willingly plays overwatch

[-] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

If there isn’t physical evidence like semen, then the victim is called a liar.

They are called liars when there is physical evidence. Not to mention the massive backlog of processing rape kits.

Yeah, this comment section is a dumpster fire of people spouting the same shit the police do when they dismiss rape accusations and the fact that they are upvoted is even more depressing.

[-] YarrMatey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 weeks ago

I absolutely agree. If rape kits are made, they can be backlogged and then degrade, which is extremely depressing to think about.

Threads like this need to be followed up with eyebleach (a community full of cute animals and such).

this post was submitted on 24 Jul 2025
143 points (78.9% liked)

Showerthoughts

36726 readers
57 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS