151
Good public transit > self driving cars
(lemmy.ml)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2025
151 points (100.0% liked)
Fuck Cars
11371 readers
61 users here now
This community exists as a sister community/copycat community to the r/fuckcars subreddit.
This community exists for the following reasons:
- to raise awareness around the dangers, inefficiencies and injustice that can come from car dependence.
- to allow a place to discuss and promote more healthy transport methods and ways of living.
You can find the Matrix chat room for this community here.
Rules
-
Be nice to each other. Being aggressive or inflammatory towards other users will get you banned. Name calling or obvious trolling falls under that. Hate cars, hate the system, but not people. While some drivers definitely deserve some hate, most of them didn't choose car-centric life out of free will.
-
No bigotry or hate. Racism, transphobia, misogyny, ableism, homophobia, chauvinism, fat-shaming, body-shaming, stigmatization of people experiencing homeless or substance users, etc. are not tolerated. Don't use slurs. You can laugh at someone's fragile masculinity without associating it with their body. The correlation between car-culture and body weight is not an excuse for fat-shaming.
-
Stay on-topic. Submissions should be on-topic to the externalities of car culture in urban development and communities globally. Posting about alternatives to cars and car culture is fine. Don't post literal car fucking.
-
No traffic violence. Do not post depictions of traffic violence. NSFW or NSFL posts are not allowed. Gawking at crashes is not allowed. Be respectful to people who are a victim of traffic violence or otherwise traumatized by it. News articles about crashes and statistics about traffic violence are allowed. Glorifying traffic violence will get you banned.
-
No reposts. Before sharing, check if your post isn't a repost. Reposts that add something new are fine. Reposts that are sharing content from somewhere else are fine too.
-
No misinformation. Masks and vaccines save lives during a pandemic, climate change is real and anthropogenic - and denial of these and other established facts will get you banned. False or highly speculative titles will get your post deleted.
-
No harassment. Posts that (may) cause harassment, dogpiling or brigading, intentionally or not, will be removed. Please do not post screenshots containing uncensored usernames. Actual harassment, dogpiling or brigading is a bannable offence.
Please report posts and comments that violate our rules.
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
@balsoft 1 - Who says public transport can't coexist in this imagiunary world?
2 - bridges for pedestrians or tunnels for vehicles.
3 - because nobody can hack the streetlights. The internet is already everywhere. Luddites are irrelevant.
But that's still not answering the main question: why do we need the system you're proposing in the first place? If we just start building more public transport and phasing out cars alltogether, it would result in better cities with faster commute times for everyone.
There's a reason why almost all crossings in cities are level crossings. And level crossings fundamentally slow down car traffic, whether it's self driving or not is irrelevant, and at rush hour it means huge traffic jams.
Hacking streetlights has very few consequences. Cities are well-lit regardless. It just makes it a bit harder to walk around. It might result in a few broken bones due to tripping on stuff, and a slight increase in instances of robbery.
But hacking the main way of transportation in a city would be disastrous. Thousands of people will literally die because of ambulances being stuck among millions of dead cars, and fire trucks not being able to make way to a fire.
Some things just don't belong on the internet. This will become more and more clear as techbros try to stick AI and IoT everywhere. After enough deaths we will learn.
In general, what you're proposing will not solve any problems that cities have (because it's fundamentally just cars, which are the main problem of modern cities) and will introduce a dozen more.
@balsoft @farbel I think your imaginary city describes how the citibikes and ebikes work in NYC now - you pick one up and ride to your destination, then dock it again. This augments the transit and coexist well with pedestrians.
In terms of street level crossings and coexistence, you want to switch to the european model where cycleways and sidewalks are continuous and have priority, and cars yield to them, using roundabouts more when an intersection is necessary.
@KevinMarks @balsoft prioritizing bikes and pedestrians is all well and good when you don't take weather into account.
@farbel @balsoft that's a real non sequiter. If weather is affecting visibility and traction there's even more reason for slowing vehicular traffic to safer speeds
@KevinMarks @balsoft I take it you bike and walk in the rain all the time?
@farbel @balsoft I do indeed. I recommend a good rain cape - I have one of these https://cleverhood.com/products/urbanaut-cape and it works great. I may need to get some waterproof trousers for very heavy rain. Snow and ice is harder, yes, but it's not persistent enough where I live to need to switch to studded tyres.
@KevinMarks @balsoft Good on you. Seriously. Most people would not.
@balsoft @farbel with properly phased lights, level crossings don't slow down car traffic; what slows it down is too many cars being used, as they are very spatially inefficient. Congestion pricing in London, New York and other cities has increased traffic speeds by replacing car usage with transit, walking and cycling.
@KevinMarks @balsoft In Tucson, where I lived and drove most of my adult life, timed traffic signals are useless, because people are too stupid to understand how they work. All it takes is one person rushing to be first in line at the next red light to gum up the works.