172
submitted 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) by sleeplessone@lemmy.ml to c/usa@lemmy.ml

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/34311432

joker-amerikkklap

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] BigPotato@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago

Depends on your HOA. Some maintain pools and parks in the area. Some exist solely to 'keep property values up.'

[-] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 21 points 2 days ago

Which is also funny to me because I would be willing to pay less if a house was In an HOA not more.

[-] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago

we had an oppressive hoa, but did a hostile takeover with the chill neighbors next door. first order of business, no more citations for unkempt lawns, no more loud noise citations, you get to treat your home like your property so long as you weren't piling up trash in the front yard. the old hoa board had a "legal" service run by an "attorney" downtown they contracted with to fine people for menial bullshit and we fired them. guess what? people started taking better care of their yards. kids are actually playing in the street (we have enough for a baseball team now). the neighborhood has never looked better.

[-] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 days ago

Surely you’re not saying that people’s lives are better with freedom than under oppression?!

[-] BigPotato@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

Same, HOAs are a non-starter for me. That said the price is going to be high with or without and those buying $500,000USD homes are probably less likely to care about an extra $100 a month.

this post was submitted on 07 Aug 2025
172 points (97.3% liked)

United States | News & Politics

8335 readers
179 users here now

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS