107
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 08 Aug 2025
107 points (93.5% liked)
Asklemmy
49912 readers
600 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy ๐
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- !lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~
founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
Posting on TikTok. TikTok is an evil mind-virus control app. Posting on it, like other closed source apps, fuels surveillance capitalism and ccp communism.
Is the see see pee in the room with you right now?
No the CCP isn't real, it's West Taiwan.
The formal name for so called Taiwan is The Republic of China, you doorknob. Interestingly, they do claim territory far beyond the borders of the current PRC borders.
I just like "West Taiwan" because it always pisses off tankies. Thanks for playing lol.
OH! And you're now blinking manually.
Now that's just bad faith.
Does "bad faith" mean "funny?" Get mad tankies.
Unless you're referring to "blinking manually," but that was a direct response to their uname.
I may be a naive optimist, but I think you know what I mean
I mean, no not really. Saying "West Taiwan" to piss off tankies isn't "a bad faith argument," it isn't even an argument. It's a joke, a jab, a jape.
So, y'know, no. I don't have any idea what you're referring to as a bad faith argument, considering no "argument" was given regardless of faith.
Ok
Good glad we cleared that up for you.