100
submitted 5 days ago by yogthos@lemmygrad.ml to c/news@hexbear.net
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 9 points 4 days ago

That's a problem inherent in the fucked up society capitalism built that alienates people. Has fuck all to do with AI.

[-] fox@hexbear.net 15 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Bad take. The Always Agrees Machine causing people to intensify psychosis or delusions is a problem tied to AI. Before it was web forums of like people, but the surge in psychosis is new

[-] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 8 points 4 days ago

Bad take. The reason people with psychosis turn to chat bots is because they're completely alienated from society and have nobody to turn to.

[-] BigWeed@hexbear.net 13 points 4 days ago

The creator of Eliza found that people would sneak into his office late at night in order to have a secret conversations with it. They would say that the chatbot understood them, even those who understood it was a program. He would be asked to leave the room so they could have private conversations with it. He found this to be very alarming and it was one of the reasons he wrote the book. These stories are in that book.

[-] CarmineCatboy2@hexbear.net 13 points 4 days ago

we were falling in love with a chatbot built in 1976? things are so cooked

[-] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 7 points 4 days ago

Have you considered that these people are a product of a society that's deeply alienating by its very nature?

[-] BigWeed@hexbear.net 13 points 4 days ago

Sure but the argument is that we shouldn't be so quick to accept technology that has negative consequences. This thread is all about job layoffs and loss of positions for those first entering the labor market because of AI speculation and labor replacement for low productivity tasks. This specific technology has consequences and maybe we shouldn't be so quick to fervently accept it with open arms.

One big theme of the book is we have a moral obligation to withhold labor from developing technology that uniquely benefits governments and large corporations. Similarly, you're defending the using ai to 'stylize text' even though it is disproportionately benefiting a fortune 500 news firm and hurting new labor entrants. The technology is not neutral and which side you are on?

[-] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 7 points 4 days ago

I mean any new technology can have negative consequences in a dystopian society. My point is that we should focus on the root causes rather than the symptoms.

What's the clear articulatable political agenda to address this problem then?

"Hey everyone, don't use this stuff that you think makes you more productive at work." Lmao

[-] BigWeed@hexbear.net 5 points 4 days ago

I hoped the takeaway was to not evangelize the tech because it hurts people and withhold your labor from furthering this type of work, rather than "don't use it". People no longer have an option with not using it, the expectation of productivity has gone up and it's either use it or be replaced by someone who will.

If someone wants to use an AI video editor to make rough cuts of socialist agitprop that they couldn't otherwise afford to make solo, then I would encourage them to do just that. It's better than the alternative, burying our head in the sand and cedeing that ground to some right winger. It's just a tool.

this post was submitted on 10 Aug 2025
100 points (100.0% liked)

news

24222 readers
593 users here now

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS