111
xkcd #3124: Grounded (imgs.xkcd.com)
submitted 2 months ago by xkcdbot@lemmy.world to c/xkcd@lemmy.world

xkcd #3124: Grounded

Title text:

We should have you at the gate in just under two hours--two and a half if we get pulled over.

Transcript:

Transcript will show once it’s been added to explainxkcd.com

Source: https://xkcd.com/3124/

explainxkcd for #3124

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Nougat@fedia.io 27 points 2 months ago

I was on a flight to Richmond, VA, many years ago. Delayed delayed, mechanical something. We finally board and depart, and right in the middle of the climb after takeoff, the plane turns real hard and heads back to the airport. People were kind of freaked out, they weren't telling us anything.

Back in the airport, we learn that there was some issue with the cabin pressure. They thought they had fixed it, they hadn't. Eventually, they decided, "Fuck it, we're going to fly across the country in this 737 at 7000 feet." Maybe a third of the passengers got back on the plane, I was one. It was cold as fuck.

[-] jqubed@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago

I think it was a co-worker who told me about flying once from one of the main NYC airports down to Raleigh or Charlotte and they’d been delayed, delayed, delayed by weather. Finally the pilots decided to Leroy Jenkins it and do the entire flight under 10k feet and using the weather radar to maneuver around storms that were dotting the east coast that day. I’m sure it was more formal than I’m remembering but he said it was by far the most unusual commercial flight he’d ever taken. This was within the last 15 years or so, well past when that was common.

[-] dandelion@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 2 months ago

why was it cold, because they couldn't maintain an internal cabin atmosphere, including temperature?

Also, I had to look it up, but just wanted to confirm 7000 feet is much lower than typical 737 cruising altitude, which is usually 30,000 - 40,000 feet.

7000 feet is still pretty high and around where oxygen saturation decreases - could you tell any effect? I just assume they were able to still oxygenate the cabin even if they couldn't go as high 🤷‍♀️

[-] Nougat@fedia.io 7 points 2 months ago

No oxygen problems that I recall. I don’t think there’s a hypoxia risk until 10K feet? Cold I’m sure because it was like flying with a window open. The heaters for the cabin air probably couldn’t keep up.

[-] misteloct@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 months ago

Hypoxia risk is usually around 14k feet. 7k feet is like skiing town tree line altitude, cold as fuck but not dangerous. Fascinating story, thanks for sharing.

[-] Fondots@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Anecdotally, the highest altitude I've ever been at hiking was around 11,000ft, and the group I was hiking with started feeling it a little bit around 9000-10,000 ft.

It wasn't dramatic, where we really noticed it was after we'd made camp, we had a little downtime and there was a bit of an open area, so we started throwing around a Frisbee, and running around chasing the Frisbee we could feel we were getting winded a bit quicker than we usually would.

Age, fitness, genetics, etc. will of course factor into that, but I suspect that most reasonably healthy people sitting in an airplane probably wouldn't feel much at 7000ft. Maybe they would if they were jogging up and down the aisle of the plane, but even then it probably wouldn't be anything too obvious, and if they didn't know anything about altitude sickness they'd probably chalk it up to being tired from the mental stress of air travel- getting to the airport, making the connection, security, lost baggage, etc.

[-] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

7000 ft is relatively common for small planes like cessnas, they don't even keep pressurized cabins, but It's fine if you stay low. So there's nothing wrong with that altitude, but it's awfully low for a jet. The jet will be flying at low fuel efficiency the whole way and it certainly won't have much wiggle room if something really goes wrong. (You can lose 7000 ft of altitude very quickly)

[-] dandelion@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

ah, I wasn't sure because I was reading this:

The oxygen saturation of hemoglobin determines the content of oxygen in blood. After the human body reaches around 2,100 metres (6,900 ft) above sea level, the saturation of oxyhemoglobin begins to decrease rapidly.[2] However, the human body has both short-term and long-term adaptations to altitude that allow it to partially compensate for the lack of oxygen. There is a limit to the level of adaptation; mountaineers refer to the altitudes above 8,000 metres (26,000 ft) as the death zone, where it is generally believed that no human body can acclimatize.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Effects_of_high_altitude_on_humans

it seemed like between 7,000 and ~~8,000~~ 26,000 the air is not suitable, but I figured the pilot wasn't likely to be taking risks like that, so there must be some explanation

edit: mixed up feet and meters

[-] azertyfun@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago

You're mixing up feet and meters. The death zone is at 8 km, i.e. 26k ft.

2100m is barely mountaineering, you can bring grandma and the newborn hiking there and at most you'll notice a mild shortness of breath.

In fact normal cabin pressure at cruising altitude is equivalent to 7000 ft. Besides a lot of ear popping most people don't even notice it, though mild altitude sickness (i.e. a small headache) is possible, but ultimately harmless.

[-] dandelion@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 months ago

ah, that explains my confusion - thank you for clearing that up!

[-] genuineparts@infosec.pub 2 points 2 months ago

why was it cold, because they couldn’t maintain an internal cabin atmosphere, including temperature?

No pilot or Jet mechanic but afaik the pressurisation is happening with bleed air from the turbines that is then cooled down to comfortable levels. So there is no "heater" for the cabin so to speak as for a warmer cabin you just cool down the bleed air less. As such without pressurisation there is also no cabin heat.

[-] Empricorn@feddit.nl 3 points 1 month ago

You just causally knew that offhand, and it's not even your industry??

[-] mr2meows@pawb.social 3 points 1 month ago

prolly went down a wikipedia rabbit hole or something

[-] genuineparts@infosec.pub 2 points 1 month ago

I am weirdly nerdy about planes. Always wanted to be a pilot as a kid.

[-] thespcicifcocean@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

~~actually, cabins are typically pressurized to around 10,000 ft, not sea level, iirc. so this was actually a higher pressure than is typically experienced in a pressurized cabin.~~

I'm wrong

I got mixed up. the limit for unpressurized cabins is 10,000 ft, so if you're flying a small plane without supplemental oxygen you can't go higher than that

[-] thebestaquaman@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Do you have a source for this? My only reference here is hiking at > 10 000 ft (3000 m), and from that I can say that this seems very unlikely: If you stay at 3000 for a couple hours without acclimating first, you will definitely start to feel the effects. To be fair, you're usually not moving around a lot in an aircraft, but a couple hours at 3000 m can make you feel sluggish and weak, and even a bit light-headed, you could even get a mild headache from oxygen deprivation.

Note that not everyone will see severe symptoms already at 3000 m. Plenty of people can go to 4000 m before seeing significant symptoms. However, given that I've never heard of anyone experiencing altitude sickness in a properly pressurised aircraft, it seems unlikely to me that they're pressurised to 3000 m.

[-] 200ok@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Did you get a window seat?

this post was submitted on 04 Aug 2025
111 points (97.4% liked)

xkcd

13301 readers
33 users here now

A community for a webcomic of romance, sarcasm, math, and language.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS