105
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] melroy@kbin.melroy.org 68 points 1 week ago

Hell no. Just use decentralized apps, fediverse etc. It's not about "protecting" children. It's about full control and power. So don't give up.

[-] Jason2357@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It’s about the information vacuum. Now every service will get your ID or photo, giving them both age and a whole sort of other metrics to build a profile on you. And yes, Lemmy.ca doesn’t know that about me.

[-] TheMonk@lemmings.world 9 points 1 week ago

I gotta be honest I thought I’d never be able to quit Reddit. But it was a lot easier when I just did it. If this shit becomes the norm, I’ll back out of a site first time they try that shit and block the site. Maybe I’ll just have to stop using the internet. Wouldn’t that be a net positive on my life. You made me do this, capitalism.

[-] Buelldozer@lemmy.today 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

You made me do this, capitalism.

This is a problem with Government not an economic system. It's about control, not dollars, pounds, or yuan.

[-] TheMonk@lemmings.world 9 points 1 week ago

But this scene was set by capitalism. The family friendly, market friendly internet is the basis for this entire issue. Yeah, government is the one finally pulling the trigger on sanctioned, total control, but we’ve been surveilled and profiled and censored for decades at this point by countless corporations for ad dollars. We’ve gone through the cycles of outrage and acquiescence and outrage and acquiescence as things have gotten worse and worse—same goes for the quality of politician, all bought and paid for by telecom companies neutering everything we can do to make the market and internet more favorable while the politicians got worse and worse and we began accepting it and just laughing it off.

And here we are. Don’t be fooled, this is 100% at the feet of capitalism.

[-] planish@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago

Capitalism runs on top of government. Governments create and enforce the notion that a human, or a fictional human with fractional ownership (corporation), can in turn own arbitrarily large and important objects.

This is often done at the behest of said arbitrarily-large-and-important-thing-owners, who also come up with other similarly terrible ideas to have the government do.

[-] RightEdofer@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 week ago

Sure but it would be trivial for a company to build profiles on people using public apps like Lemmy.

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago

If it was so trivial why would they even bother making everyone show their IDs?

[-] pennomi@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

But not necessarily link it to your other accounts or real identity, which is the point.

[-] Buelldozer@lemmy.today -2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Unless you are one of the extreme privacy people, like deep into freakaziod territory, the folks who build tracking / id systems would maybe need an afternoon to go from your Lemmy username to your home address and underwear size.

[-] pennomi@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

For my account sure. I use the same username most places. But it’s also reasonable to have a fairly decent Lemmy account that’s decoupled from all your other online accounts. Use a temp email provider, VPN, and proper browser and you’re most of the way there.

[-] RightEdofer@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago

There is a lot of information in the way you type and the topics you choose to discuss. More than we suspect.

[-] Buelldozer@lemmy.today 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

decentralized apps, fediverse

Those apps and / or the fediverse itself would get sued into the ground and shut down one app or server at a time. There's nothing stopping any Governments authorities from going after servers inside their borders and there's nothing stopping them from "harmonizing" identity verification restrictions among other countries. They've already done it once with Intellectual Property law.

This push to de-anonymize the Internet isn't new either. Microsoft started this back in the oughts with their Passport / Digital-ID program. Google and Meta, along with others, long ago launched their own versions and it's why you can sign into so many websites with a Google or Facebook account.

It's generally referred to as IdP and now that the Internet has been fully corporatized, with minor holdouts, you can bet your bippy that the days of anonymous access are ending.

[-] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago

If only there was a non-commercial, decentralized way of doing the same thing we are already doing. Perhaps make it free too. Hmmm

[-] Poem_for_your_sprog@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

You'd need to decentralize the Internet itself. Good luck with that one...

[-] krashmo@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

What do you mean by that? Most of the infrastructure that makes up the internet is owned by like 6 companies.

[-] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago
[-] krashmo@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

So do a million different forms of encryption. That doesn't make the infrastructure any less centralized. If the people who own the fiber decide to only allow pre-approved types of traffic to cross their networks then it doesn't make any difference what sort of protocols exist. Building free cross-country or subsea fiber routes is not economically viable and the internet doesn't exist without them.

[-] sexy_peach@feddit.org 1 points 1 week ago

That's a very different story than requiring I'd for some websites

[-] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 week ago

Please look into how i2p works. It’s not just some form of encryption.

[-] krashmo@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Please explain how you can bypass carrier enforced traffic shaping policy.

From geti2p.net:

I2P's protocols are efficient on most platforms, including cell phones, and secure for most threat models. However, there are several areas which require further improvement to meet the needs of those facing powerful state-sponsored adversaries, and to meet the threats of continued cryptographic advances and ever-increasing computing power.

The people involved in the project you're referring to acknowledge that governments can, by influencing carrier policy, disrupt and subvert the project's intended function. Why then are you implying they are incorrect?

[-] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 week ago

You are arguing a different point here than you were above and I’m not going to entertain the misdirect.

[-] Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago

Last time I checked, the p!rate bay still exists. In fact there are many of them. Because the website itself is open source. The same could be done with any other site. If one gets taken down, two more pop up in it's place.

[-] fuzzzerd@programming.dev 1 points 1 week ago

While true, most sites do not have the fame of the pirate bay and will not see anywhere near the same number of fans hosting remakes, even if the source is available.

[-] belit_deg@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

Also apps that don't need servers. Switched to this for staying in touch with family p2p, works surprisingly well https://keet.io/

this post was submitted on 04 Aug 2025
105 points (94.9% liked)

Technology

74099 readers
1230 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS