117
submitted 2 days ago by bubbalouie@lemmy.ml to c/firefox@lemmy.ml

People ragging on the only viable browser solution we have... Firefox is rock solid, fast, tweakable, and keeps me as safe as any browser and my configs/habits can. I don't care if management eats babies.

I use it on debian with celenity phoenix and a few about:config tweaks, also tweak'd the theme a bit. Extensions: ublock origin, sponsorblock, localcdn, consent-o-matic, containers, keepassxc-browser, and sometimes jshelter.

web browsing: solved

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Undertaker@feddit.org 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

It's the least worse we have but it's far from good. Security issues, AI, telemetry and so on.

You gave proof as well as you thought your have to modify about:config and use several add ons.
This should not be necessary except for Ublock and tool related add ons.

Calling something good and ignoring problems do not make something good.

Web browsing: Still torture

[-] KarnaSubarna@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago

While I do know the general concerns about AI and telemetry use in Firefox, but can you shed some light on Security issue? Thanks.

[-] RoadTrain@lemdro.id 1 points 1 day ago

Historically, Firefox has had fewer security measures than Chrome. For example, full tab isolation was only implemented recently in Firefox, many years after Chrome. MV3-only extentions in Chrome also reduce the attack surface from that perspective.

The counterpoint to this is that there are much fewer users of Firefox, so it less attractive to try to exploit. Finding a vulnerability in Chrome is much more lucrative, since it has the potential to reach more targets.

[-] KarnaSubarna@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

If I'm not mistaken then Chrome enabled Site isolation in 2019 and Firefox in 2021[1].

MV3 itself is controversial[2] as it unfairly targets extensions that block ad - a major source of revenue for Alphabet.

Alphabet has all the money in the world to make a browser as secure and as privacy friendly as possible. Their focus is only on "secure browser" part.

Mozilla lacks of funding (in compare to Alphabet), but still mostly outdo Alphabet on the "privacy" aspect of browser. And, they play catching up game on security aspect of browser.

  1. https://blog.mozilla.org/security/2021/05/18/introducing-site-isolation-in-firefox/
  2. https://blog.mozilla.org/en/firefox/firefox-manifest-v3-adblockers/

And AFAIK, tab isolation still isn't a thing in Firefox for Android. It's frustrating.

this post was submitted on 13 Aug 2025
117 points (88.2% liked)

Firefox

20646 readers
238 users here now

/c/firefox

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox.


Rules

1. Adhere to the instance rules

2. Be kind to one another

3. Communicate in a civil manner


Reporting

If you would like to bring an issue to the moderators attention, please use the "Create Report" feature on the offending comment or post and it will be reviewed as time allows.


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS