68
Electricity prices climbing faster than inflation.
(www.npr.org)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2025
68 points (100.0% liked)
news
24233 readers
401 users here now
Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.
Rules:
-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --
-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --
-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --
-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --
-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--
-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--
-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --
-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
or maybe their house is like a sieve and the only way to keep the room temperature normal is to blast the AC.
also, huge windows, no (or not enough) overhangs, no outside shutters (curtains and blinds are dogshit lies). a shitton of housing stock was not designed for any kind of real climate.
There is a difference between setting the AC unit to 65F and having the room at 65F. I have no problem with the former if it's the only way to maintain normal temperatures, but if it's the latter it's wasteful
Good lord the house me, my parents, and my 3 siblings live in is complete disaster. The building started life in the mid to late 1800s... as a single floor funeral home with a crematorium in the basement. Then sometime it got rezoned to be a house, and expanded on so much that it became a two floor sorta two family home since it technically is two addresses (the first floor is house number and the 2nd floor is house number and a half, including the fact it has two electric meters, two gas meters, and so on), now the quality of these expansions wildly varies though mostly on the bad side, like on the level of we're sure it may just end up being cheaper to just tear it down and build a new house than spend forever (and money we don't have) chasing all the issues it has.
Now, I mentioned that my mom and sister can't stand temps below a certain point, during winter due to again probably the quality of the expansions, my room just holds onto heat all the time, meanwhile my mom's room and sister's room seem to not exactly hold onto heat very well. You can start seeing where the problems start creeping up. So that window unit is pretty much the only thing keeping my room at a semi regular temperature during both summer and winter.
yeah, it can be ridiculously expensive to make an old house airtight after the fact. tear off all the cladding and possibly the roof too, airseal the whole fucking thing from foundation to the top, then rebuild the outside. something like that.
and that's just airtightness, but what about insulation?
It's far beyond old house we're dealing with here, the expansions the original building had went through includes near doubling the foundation footprint, gutting it and changing it probably several times throughout it's life, like the stairs to the 2nd floor when the 2nd floor was added was originally on the other side of the house, not to mention the addition of the backrooms on the first floor that wasn't integrated with the rest of the first floor in terms of air circulation. And for the fun part, there's asbestos in the house, how much? We know the answer is "Yes" for sure, and I'm pretty sure the insulation has asbestos in it too.
Like from what my dad had told me, the city documents for the property shows that the building had been expanded, changed, and added onto at least 20+ times throughout it's life.
oh awesome, that means that tearing it all down and starting from scratch is even more expensive, cos you gotta hire someone to safely bag the asbestos. or do it yourself and die from cancer in a decade.
The only reason we know there's asbestos in the house is because we were going to tear all the carpet in the house out before moving in, then we began to find asbestos underneath several layers of flooring under the carpet in the back room of the first floor, which made us decide to not rip up that one carpet in the back room at all. As for the insulation, I'm not exactly 100% on my assumption of it having asbestos too, but I wouldn't be surprised if it was.
Sure would be a bad time to learn that the metal roof was leaky in one spot, and would cause us have to set up a drip bucket in the attic that would have to be emptied out every time it rained, and said attic space had all the insulation completely exposed to open air, and didn't have the money to properly deal with that issue for several years....