119

Image is of a large protest in the Ivory Coast, sourced from this article in People's Dispatch.


This week's megathread is based largely on a detailed article from People's Dispatch, featuring statements and analysis from Achy Ekessi, the General Secretary of the Revolutionary Communist Party of Ivory Coast (PCRCI), brought to my attention by @jack@hexbear.net's comment in the last megathread.

The president of Ivory Coast, the 83 year old Alassane Ouattara, is aiming for a fourth term in power while barring out much of the opposition. I can't really do the all the history of how the situation wound up this way justice in a preamble as it's fairly complicated (read the article if you are interested), but to summarize, Ouattara is currently the only coherent candidate for the French to support. Back in 2011, the French helped Ouattara overthrow the previous (pan-Africanist) president, Laurent Gbagbo, and then arrested him and sent him to the ICC, and he was then acquitted and released in 2021.

Gbagbo is now running against Ouattara, but his base, the working class, has large swathes that are not present on the voting rolls and so it would be unlikely for him to win. On the opposite side of the spectrum is Tidjane Thiam, a former CEO of the Swiss Bank Credit Suisse, whose base is in the richer strata of the Ivory Coast, which overlaps with Ouattara's base. He would be more likely to win, but would certainly maintain many Western imperialist relationships. Ouattara, however, has simplified the electoral situation by simply barring both of them from running in the election at all.

Ouattara has, on paper, delivered some amount of economic development to the Ivory Coast. But as expected, most of it is funnelled to the bourgeois, as well as to foreign corporations and governments, while the working class are swallowed by the cost of living crisis. There has been significant infrastructure projects, but these have not only generated massive debt, they also have only really addressed the damage caused by the 2011 civil war and intervention by the French.

The rest of Western Africa has either entirely exited the orbit of France (Niger, Mali, Burkina Faso), are wavering/unstable (Senegal, Benin, Guinea), are beginning to show doubts (Nigeria, Ghana), or are economically weak enough to not be a major blow for the French to lose (Togo, Guinea-Bissau). The loss of the Ivory Coast would be a major setback for French neocolonialism, and be a potent example to nearby countries.


Last week's thread is here.
The Imperialism Reading Group is here.

Please check out the RedAtlas!

The bulletins site is here. Currently not used.
The RSS feed is here. Also currently not used.

Israel's Genocide of Palestine

If you have evidence of Zionist crimes and atrocities that you wish to preserve, there is a thread here in which to do so.

Sources on the fighting in Palestine against the temporary Zionist entity. In general, CW for footage of battles, explosions, dead people, and so on:

UNRWA reports on Israel's destruction and siege of Gaza and the West Bank.

English-language Palestinian Marxist-Leninist twitter account. Alt here.
English-language twitter account that collates news.
Arab-language twitter account with videos and images of fighting.
English-language (with some Arab retweets) Twitter account based in Lebanon. - Telegram is @IbnRiad.
English-language Palestinian Twitter account which reports on news from the Resistance Axis. - Telegram is @EyesOnSouth.
English-language Twitter account in the same group as the previous two. - Telegram here.

English-language PalestineResist telegram channel.
More telegram channels here for those interested.

Russia-Ukraine Conflict

Examples of Ukrainian Nazis and fascists
Examples of racism/euro-centrism during the Russia-Ukraine conflict

Sources:

Defense Politics Asia's youtube channel and their map. Their youtube channel has substantially diminished in quality but the map is still useful.
Moon of Alabama, which tends to have interesting analysis. Avoid the comment section.
Understanding War and the Saker: reactionary sources that have occasional insights on the war.
Alexander Mercouris, who does daily videos on the conflict. While he is a reactionary and surrounds himself with likeminded people, his daily update videos are relatively brainworm-free and good if you don't want to follow Russian telegram channels to get news. He also co-hosts The Duran, which is more explicitly conservative, racist, sexist, transphobic, anti-communist, etc when guests are invited on, but is just about tolerable when it's just the two of them if you want a little more analysis.
Simplicius, who publishes on Substack. Like others, his political analysis should be soundly ignored, but his knowledge of weaponry and military strategy is generally quite good.
On the ground: Patrick Lancaster, an independent and very good journalist reporting in the warzone on the separatists' side.

Unedited videos of Russian/Ukrainian press conferences and speeches.

Pro-Russian Telegram Channels:

Again, CW for anti-LGBT and racist, sexist, etc speech, as well as combat footage.

https://t.me/aleksandr_skif ~ DPR's former Defense Minister and Colonel in the DPR's forces. Russian language.
https://t.me/Slavyangrad ~ A few different pro-Russian people gather frequent content for this channel (~100 posts per day), some socialist, but all socially reactionary. If you can only tolerate using one Russian telegram channel, I would recommend this one.
https://t.me/s/levigodman ~ Does daily update posts.
https://t.me/patricklancasternewstoday ~ Patrick Lancaster's telegram channel.
https://t.me/gonzowarr ~ A big Russian commentator.
https://t.me/rybar ~ One of, if not the, biggest Russian telegram channels focussing on the war out there. Actually quite balanced, maybe even pessimistic about Russia. Produces interesting and useful maps.
https://t.me/epoddubny ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/boris_rozhin ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/mod_russia_en ~ Russian Ministry of Defense. Does daily, if rather bland updates on the number of Ukrainians killed, etc. The figures appear to be approximately accurate; if you want, reduce all numbers by 25% as a 'propaganda tax', if you don't believe them. Does not cover everything, for obvious reasons, and virtually never details Russian losses.
https://t.me/UkraineHumanRightsAbuses ~ Pro-Russian, documents abuses that Ukraine commits.

Pro-Ukraine Telegram Channels:

Almost every Western media outlet.
https://discord.gg/projectowl ~ Pro-Ukrainian OSINT Discord.
https://t.me/ice_inii ~ Alleged Ukrainian account with a rather cynical take on the entire thing.


you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Tervell@hexbear.net 53 points 1 month ago

https://archive.ph/X895Z

The urgent need to procure more THAAD interceptors

The U.S. Army’s Terminal High Altitude Area Defense “Talon” interceptor inventory is unacceptably low, potentially leaving U.S. forces vulnerable in a future conflict. The service reportedly consumed nearly a quarter of its interceptors during the 12-Day War between Israel and Iran in June, and absent aggressive congressional intervention, it will take too long to replenish and expand stocks. The U.S. Missile Defense Agency awarded a $2.06 billion contract modification to produce Terminal High Altitude Area Defense, or THAAD, “Talon” interceptors late last month. That step is laudable but insufficient. Congress needs to help by approving the administration’s request to shift money between programs to purchase more interceptors, providing enough funding to procure the maximum number of interceptors industry can produce next fiscal year and pushing the Pentagon and industry to expand production capacity as quickly as possible, among other steps.

THAAD is a U.S.-produced, land-based missile defense system that uses hit-to-kill interceptors to destroy short-, medium- and intermediate-range ballistic missiles both inside and outside of the atmosphere. Currently, the U.S. Army possesses eight THAAD batteries, with six launchers per battery and eight interceptors per launcher for a total of 48 interceptors loaded per battery. THAAD forms the upper layer of the Army’s land-based theater ballistic missile defenses, with Patriot comprising the lower layer and both complementing naval interceptors, such as the SM-3 and SM-6. During June’s 12-Day War, Iran reportedly fired over 500 ballistic missiles at Israel during the conflict and around a dozen at a U.S. airbase in Qatar, destroying a geodesic dome. The United States assisted Israel in shooting down many of the ballistic missiles, including with the multiple THAAD batteries deployed to the Middle East during the war, demonstrating interoperability within a larger architecture.

Estimates vary on the precise number of THAAD interceptors expended, but The Wall Street Journal, citing U.S. officials, reported that more than 150 interceptors were fired. To put that number in perspective, the Department of Defense previously committed funding for 646 interceptors, according to Pentagon fiscal 2026 budget documents published in June 2025. Understanding that some of those may not have been delivered yet or were used in testing, the expenditure of 150 interceptors would amount to roughly a quarter of the total U.S. THAAD interceptor inventory.

It is reasonable to ask why the U.S. has such a small inventory of interceptors. One need look no further than the level of procurement before the 12-Day War. The Pentagon requested only 25 interceptors in its base defense budget request for FY26 and another 12 through reconciliation, for a total of 37. While admittedly an increase compared to the paltry 11 procured in FY24 and 12 in FY25, the procurement of 37 interceptors next fiscal year is entirely insufficient. Indeed, at that rate, it would take around four years to replenish the interceptors used during the 12-Day War. Given growing threats to American interests in the Middle East, Europe and the Pacific, that is unacceptable. If the United States struggled to deal with Iran’s arsenal, imagine what might happen in a conflict with China, which possesses around 2,700 short-, medium- and intermediate-range ballistic missiles and is building more. To make matters worse, Russia more than doubled its ballistic missile production from 2023 to 2024 and continues to further expand production, according to Ukrainian intelligence. Additionally, North Korea continues to advance its missile program to threaten regional targets and the U.S. homeland, further underscoring the need for more robust U.S. missile defense infrastructure and stockpiles.

Thankfully, there are steps available to replenish and expand the U.S. Army’s inventory of THAAD interceptors. As a first step, Congress should approve without delay the above threshold reprogramming request submitted on July 15. That will allow the Pentagon to move money and acquire additional interceptors more quickly, especially with the Missile Defense Agency’s July 28 $2.06 billion contract modification. But Congress should not stop there. For FY26, Congress should authorize and appropriate the funding necessary to procure the maximum quantity of interceptors that industry can produce. Current full-rate production is 96 THAAD “Talon” interceptors per year, and industry could produce as many as 144 interceptors in FY26. With additional steps, industry could produce even more going forward. Admittedly, a portion of current production levels goes toward fulfilling foreign military sales to Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, whose orders kept the production line from atrophying while U.S. demand (unwisely) slackened.

But industry is prepared to make the investments necessary to increase production levels further, if only Washington will procure the maximum quantity industry can produce and signal to industry its determination to do so for at least the next five years.

uh, yeah, sure, "prepared", just like how Intel was prepared to build all those factories with the CHIPS act...

The assertive use of multiyear procurement authority and appropriation can incentivize such industry behavior. To encourage such a decision by industry and to inform future Pentagon requests and congressional authorizations and appropriations, Congress should require an annual report from the Pentagon listing 1) current maximum production levels for THAAD interceptors and 2) steps that are being taken and could be taken to expand maximum production capacity each year. Notably, the Senate Appropriations Committee approved an increase of $923 million for additional THAAD interceptors and related investments on July 31. That is an effort the full Congress and the administration should support. Washington has underinvested in air and missile defense for too long and is now facing the consequences. Thankfully, there are several steps available that can begin to address the shortfall of THAAD interceptors. Ensuring U.S. service members have the missile defenses they need in a future conflict requires urgent action in Washington today.

[-] ColombianLenin@hexbear.net 31 points 1 month ago

Clearer and clearer how Iran fucking stomped isntrael amerikkka

[-] MarmiteLover123@hexbear.net 19 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Glad to see more posts, I enjoy reading them, especially your posts, especially on tanks and the like, I know little about them.

While admittedly an increase compared to the paltry 11 procured in FY24 and 12 in FY25, the procurement of 37 interceptors next fiscal year is entirely insufficient. Indeed, at that rate, it would take around four years to replenish the interceptors used during the 12-Day War.

Current full-rate production is 96 THAAD “Talon” interceptors per year, and industry could produce as many as 144 interceptors in FY26. With additional steps, industry could produce even more going forward. Admittedly, a portion of current production levels goes toward fulfilling foreign military sales to Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, whose orders kept the production line from atrophying while U.S. demand (unwisely) slackened.

It's important to note that it's actually the inverse, the US Army has procured small amounts of THAAD Talon interceptors in recent years to facilitate foreign military sales to the UAE, Saudi Arabia and future sales to Qatar. In the past, the US Army has procured 100+ Talon interceptors in a single financial year, in fact they did it in 2018 and 2019. By all accounts the production line is operating at current maximum capacity of around 80-100+ Talon interceptors per year. The majority of Talon interceptors are prioritised for foreign military sales over the past few years. Over 1000 interceptors have been produced for the US and foreign customers. The UAE two battery sale would be 96 interceptors, the current single battery in Saudi Arabia would be 48 interceptors, and the six more batteries Saudi Arabia have already procured would be an additional 288 interceptors, some still in manufacturing obviously.

Also as of recent July 31st documents, the United States Army is procuring an additional 46 interceptors on top of the already planned 37, for a total of 83 interceptors for the 2026 financial year.

Yeah these are low numbers, but it's really hard to compare because the only point of comparison is the Chinese HQ-19. And we don't know how many HQ-19 batteries and interceptors China produces. All we know is that China also took around two decades to test and build the system, similar to THAAD. So the technology is likely very complex and difficult to master.

I'd say the bigger problem for the US is not the amount of interceptors, but the force structure. They'd need at least double the amount of batteries/fire units. Interceptor production would follow on that.

[-] Tervell@hexbear.net 15 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Yeah these are low numbers, but it's really hard to compare because the only point of comparison is the Chinese HQ-19

I definitely don't disagree that the US is far ahead on the air-defense game, but I feel like what this is showing is that the furthest ahead on the air-defense game is still not enough. If Iran indeed exhausted 25% of the total (American) supply, with what seemed to not even be that intense of a bombardment campaign - then they, or another country, simply have to repeat this another 3 times, and... I guess that's it? 48 days and then it's a shooting gallery? Ballistic missile stockpiles are far larger, and their continued production seems like it would definitely far outpace THAAD production.

Basically, my feeling is that in the unfortunate event of a large-scale attritional conflict, everyone's going to get the shit bombed out of them - the US may have a short period at the start where they can resist, but eventually they'll start taking hits too. And in that case (assuming things don't escalate into posadist-nuke, which they may well do...), the country with the larger stockpile of missiles and capacity of continued manufacture, and the political will and morale of their population to stay in the fight despite taking hits, will be in the more favorable position. And, beyond just the ammunition supply, there's also the simple limitation in number of batteries - in a previous article, it was stated that the defense of Israel involved 2 batteries, plus multiple ships (for which the munitions situations seems like it may well have been even worse), plus the Israelis own air defense network. There's 7 THAAD batteries total - what can they even defend with them, if two with extensive support are barely enough for an Israel-sized strip of land? The US, for its own absolutely massive home territory, has just 2 batteries as well!

Again, other countries might not even have that capability of at least some initial air defense, and start taking hits right away - but I feel like Russia and China, and even Iran, are way better prepared for surviving a sustained bombardment campaign than a country like the US, in which civil defense planning is a joke, and which struggles to respond to even the most basic environmental crises. If a war involving the bombardment of US home soil (which, tbf, is pretty unlikely thanks to being bounded by two oceans, that's why video games have to keep inventing some ridiculous scenario or other for why a Soviet/Russian invasion of America could somehow happen) drags on beyond, like, literally two weeks, what even happens domestically? Somehow, I don't see the average US citizen being able to handle things the way the Ukrainian citizens of Kiev and other cities are able to... (which I guess only increases the risk of nuke)

[-] MarmiteLover123@hexbear.net 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Basically, my feeling is that in the unfortunate event of a large-scale attritional conflict, everyone's going to get the shit bombed out of them

That's generally how any near peer or peer conflict goes. I'd agree. If you go to war, expect to take a lot of hits.

But I'd say that the primary means of defeat, if that's the primary objective, of ballistic missiles, cruise missiles, drones, etc, for any army, US, China, Russia, should never be interceptions though, that's setting up for failure. Any defence system can be overwhelmed. The primary means of intercept has to be left of launch defeat/before launch destruction and suppression, as well as interdiction for drones and cruise missiles, for a chance of success. Otherwise the adversary can just fire endless weapons at you. There are lots of interesting developments there, from TV guided glide bombs and missiles that can hit moving targets from extended ranges (Israel has lots of these), to the most interesting one under development, the Stand in Attack Weapon (SiAW): which is an AGM-88G AARGM-ER modified to hit targets that are not air defences, including ballistic missile launchers. The AGM-88G has a range of 300+km, is capable of hypersonic speeds, is low observable/stealth, and can fit in the internal weapons bay of an F-35. China's anti access/area denial bubble in a way also reduces the size of a potential US salvo, as the US has to carry out missions from further and further away. I also hope that China is working on air interdiction for JASSM type missiles, as that's the USA's Trump card there. The JASSM stockpile and production rates are very large for the type of weapon it is.

Ballistic missile defence is not just THAAD/ niche endo-exo-atmospheric systems. Patriot is getting a lot of upgrades in the next few years that are set to turn it into a mini THAAD of sorts, including a new radar that will allow the PAC-3 MSE interceptor to have a higher effective altitude ceiling and 360° engagement capabilities, and a new interceptor to further improve on the PAC 3 MSE. I think that would be more relevant to a China-US conflict, considering the plans to load PAC 3 MSE onboard AEGIS equipped destroyers and cruisers with the SPY radar. Don't know of any plans to load THAAD on warships, it's likely not possible. China is also likely to unveil their PAC 3 analogue this year. Though PAC-3 MSE numbers are significantly higher than THAAD, it's still pretty low, but that's the story of air defence, everyone always wants more, and it's impossible. I think even Russia wants more right now given Ukrainian drone attacks. China has a ton of HQ-9s, but I'm unsure how suited they are to ballistic or supersonic cruise missile defence. They didn't do well in Pakistan against ballistic, supersonic and low observable missiles from India and the system they're based on, the S-300PMU2/SA-20, didn't do well in Iran last year. Serms to be more suited to aircraft and less sophisticated cruise missiles, the last of which is what the S-300P was originally designed to do, to intercept AGM-86 and BGM-109 Tomahawk/Gryphon cruise missiles headed towards Moscow. Higher performance ballistic missiles and supersonic missiles were the threat S-300V was designed to take care of.

this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2025
119 points (99.2% liked)

news

24382 readers
1030 users here now

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS