64
submitted 1 week ago by Pro@mander.xyz to c/science@mander.xyz
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 27 points 1 week ago

Plot twist: it never was 🖕🏽

[-] otp@sh.itjust.works 20 points 1 week ago

It works the first couple of times the receiver gets feedback that way. In their entire lives.

I've realized that what the article says applies to me -- it can be hard to receive positive feedback when you're anticipating the upcoming "constructive feedback".

And then you're left wondering how hard it was for them to come up with the positive stuff. Is the positive stuff all fake just for the purposes of wrapping the "constructive" part?

[-] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 week ago

Frankly, it's always seemed to me like a polishing of the turd inherent to "Nothing matters before the 'but'." It's exactly that old bullshit, plus another pandering half-thought at the end. The shit sandwich is the fastest way to lose my interest, much less respect. 🤌🏼

this post was submitted on 25 Aug 2025
64 points (97.1% liked)

Science

5269 readers
4 users here now

General discussions about "science" itself

Be sure to also check out these other Fediverse science communities:

https://lemmy.ml/c/science

https://beehaw.org/c/science

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS