225
submitted 2 days ago by rcbrk@lemmy.ml to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/35909566

SMH @ activists using techno-fascist platforms for communications during an operation subject to state-actor level interference. I thought we recognised and acknowledged this problem 15-20 years ago already.

https://xcancel.com/CraigMurrayOrg/status/1965431513320927706

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Zak@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

It does not have the option to encrypt group chats last I checked, and even the one-to-one encryption is not particularly well-liked among security experts.

This isn't about casual chats with friends and family, but political activism against the actions of a country. People doing that should be willing to put at least a trivial amount of effort into security.

[-] Dreaming_Novaling@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago

Oh yeah, I know they're dogshit and that the activists should've been using Signal, I just didn't realize that Telegram doesn't encrypt group chats.

[-] m532@lemmygrad.ml -1 points 1 day ago

Signal is sUS. Cia will read and genocide

this post was submitted on 09 Sep 2025
225 points (99.1% liked)

Privacy

41621 readers
647 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS