view the rest of the comments
news
Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.
Rules:
-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --
-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --
-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --
-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --
-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--
-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--
-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --
-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --
Can be, not are. You are not required to report crimes unless you are a mandatory reporter. Last I checked 11 year olds aren't that.
If you witness a crime, you are not required to report it. However, if it becomes known that you witnessed it, you can be compelled to testify in court. This doesn't apply at all to this situation, but I'm saying it because people who might be in court one day in
should understand it.
Again, the premise of applying this logic to this situation is incorrect. This isn't a court, it's a school. He has no legal rights protecting him from giving up a peer in this context (which means the school could and did expel him), and the correct rights for him to have in an ideal society wouldn't be the ones granted by the American constitution. A school should be a place where children are nurtured and assisted by adults, not a mirror of a system of courts. The fact that this child was treated as a presumed criminal is a failure, which we can only compound by analyzing it with this legalistic framework. These children should not expect to be punished by default, and these adults should not punish them unless absolutely necessary.