148
UK once again demands backdoor to Apple’s encrypted cloud storage
(arstechnica.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 02 Oct 2025
148 points (100.0% liked)
Privacy
42269 readers
632 users here now
A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.
Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.
In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.
Some Rules
- Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
- Don't promote proprietary software
- Try to keep things on topic
- If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
- Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
- Be nice :)
Related communities
much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
The real reason for this is because pedophiles have been getting away with sharing CP and there's literally nothing the authorities can do about it.
Don't get me wrong, governments always want more surveillance of their populations. It's just in this specific case, they are trying to force it as much as possible because they can't tolerate people sharing CP without repercussion.
If we want privacy, we have to accept that it will be abused by some people for nefarious purposes.
We can all condemn CP and rightfully so. But it's asinine to think you can break encryption and that only the good guys will be able to take advantage of that.
The same people passing these laws to protect kids, fuck kids.
Pedophiles are obviously the excuse to gather public support? It's fascinating that you actually believe them when they say they want to protect children.
It's fascinating you don't believe that authorities are frustrated by people sharing CP without repercussions.
In this specific case, there's a legitimate argument to be made for protecting kids even if you don't think it's worth the increased surveillance.
I'm kidding by the way about it being fascinating. It's actually really stupid and doesn't surprise me that people like you would believe nonsense.
Wow. You actually believe them when they tell you they want to protect children. That's fascinating.
Ignored.
Heaven forbid you talk to anyone outside your echo chamber lol
That will happen regardless of you having privacy or not.