456
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] douglasg14b@lemmy.world 68 points 1 month ago

Still linear time at least, could always be much MUCH worse

[-] dfyx@lemmy.helios42.de 44 points 1 month ago

There could be a hidden quadratic cost because the string needs to be reallocated and copied multiple times.

[-] Jerkface@lemmy.world 44 points 1 month ago
[-] aaaaaaaaargh@feddit.org 11 points 1 month ago

This is the spirit

[-] kogasa@programming.dev 5 points 1 month ago

Not quadratic in the length of the input. Assuming replace is linear this is also linear

[-] lugal@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 1 month ago

True. Lost opportunity to blow things up with useless recursivity

[-] bleistift2@sopuli.xyz 17 points 1 month ago

The word you’re looking for is recursion (see recursion).

[-] Gonzako@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

Nah, I'd like to un-see recursion. It was way overblown on uni, I barely ever use it.

[-] Cethin@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 month ago

Recursion is amazing for a small selection of problems. Most of the time you don't need, or want, it. When it is useful though, it tends to be really useful.

I don't understand people's issue with it. I always found it easy. Maybe that's why I feel this way. Maybe if you find it challenging you want to avoid it, even when it's a good solution.

[-] kamstrup@programming.dev 4 points 1 month ago

Most devs I know like recursion. Trouble is that many popular languages don't support tail recursion, but throw a stackoverflow error after a few thousand levels. So you have to keep track of max recursion depth manually, and it starts to look like a complicated solution

[-] Ephera@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 month ago

I think, their point (and also my experience) is that you get taught about it in university a lot more than about simple loops, so it feels more important even though you rarely use it in reality.

Same thing goes for linked lists and inheritance...

[-] embed_me@programming.dev 2 points 1 month ago

Linked lists are encountered somewhat frequently in low level systems programming.

[-] kamstrup@programming.dev 1 points 1 month ago

Most devs I know like recursion. Trouble is that many popular languages don't support tail recursion, but throw a stackoverflow error after a few thousand levels. So you have to keep track of max recursion depth manually, and it starts to look like a complicated solution

[-] lugal@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 month ago

Thanks. I knew something was off

this post was submitted on 11 Oct 2025
456 points (99.8% liked)

Programmer Humor

27720 readers
141 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS