41
New paper tries to define AGI, cites hallucinated papers
(xcancel.com)
Hurling ordure at the TREACLES, especially those closely related to LessWrong.
AI-Industrial-Complex grift is fine as long as it sufficiently relates to the AI doom from the TREACLES. (Though TechTakes may be more suitable.)
This is sneer club, not debate club. Unless it's amusing debate.
[Especially don't debate the race scientists, if any sneak in - we ban and delete them as unsuitable for the server.]
See our twin at Reddit
Didn't OpenAI and Microsoft already come to an agreement like a year ago that AGI means when OpenAI makes a gorillion dollars, or something like that? I remember some leaked docs contained something to that effect.
https://pivot-to-ai.com/2025/01/06/sam-altman-ai-agents-will-totally-replace-your-employees-any-year-now-also-chatgpt-pro-is-losing-money/
Actually Generates Income
@blakestacey @sneerclub So, never. got it.
What I like about this definition is that the lint in my navel is about 15% closer to AGI than OpenAI, having produced zero dollars of profit for them.