41
New paper tries to define AGI, cites hallucinated papers (xcancel.com)
submitted 1 week ago by TinyTimmyTokyo@awful.systems to c/sneerclub@awful.systems
7 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Some of our very best friends (including Dan Hendrycks, Max Tegmark, Jaan Tallinn, and Yoshua Bengio) just uploaded to arxiv a preprint that attempts to define the term "artificial general intelligence".

Turns out the paper was at least partly written by an LLM, because it cites hallucinated papers. In response, Hendrycks tries to pull a fast one, pretending that it's Google Docs' fault.

(Gary Marcus is also a coauthor on this paper for some reason.)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] blakestacey@awful.systems 13 points 1 week ago

But Sam can build the AGI! Sort of — OpenAI and Microsoft recently redefined “artificial general intelligence” as OpenAI making $100 billion profit. Yes, really.

https://pivot-to-ai.com/2025/01/06/sam-altman-ai-agents-will-totally-replace-your-employees-any-year-now-also-chatgpt-pro-is-losing-money/

[-] dgerard@awful.systems 8 points 6 days ago

Actually Generates Income

[-] bitofhope@awful.systems 4 points 6 days ago

What I like about this definition is that the lint in my navel is about 15% closer to AGI than OpenAI, having produced zero dollars of profit for them.

this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2025
41 points (100.0% liked)

SneerClub

1200 readers
28 users here now

Hurling ordure at the TREACLES, especially those closely related to LessWrong.

AI-Industrial-Complex grift is fine as long as it sufficiently relates to the AI doom from the TREACLES. (Though TechTakes may be more suitable.)

This is sneer club, not debate club. Unless it's amusing debate.

[Especially don't debate the race scientists, if any sneak in - we ban and delete them as unsuitable for the server.]

See our twin at Reddit

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
self@awful.systems
blakestacey@awful.systems
dgerard@awful.systems