102

Source: https://www.reddit.com/r/Teachers/comments/1p48x0x/can_anyone_confirm_are_modern_students_really/

Turns out that capitalism in decay produces an environment which is actively harmful to human growth and flourishing. Who could have predicted that?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] godlessworm@hexbear.net 4 points 3 weeks ago

i didn't say you said it's a new thing, i said it's not a new thing so we can't act like modern problems are to be blamed on suddenly there being a bunch of parents who aren't well equipped to raise kids.

what does "people shouldn't be allowed to be parents" even mean?

[-] LeeeroooyJeeenkiiins@hexbear.net 7 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

It means that it says, I think it's wack what people are essentially given godlike authority over the lives and development of their children. So you have a biological drive to procreate, that's cool dawg, that doesn't mean you should be a parent. People put less thought into having and raising children than they put into training dogs and that's not saying anything great about the general state of pet ownership either.

Nobody needs to tell me how requiring people to have some sort of training or qualifications to have kids could (and would) lead to eugenecist bullshit so I dunno I guess the only solution is to let people have whatever kids they want and take all the kids and raise them communally by people who are paid a shitload and expressly trained and motivated for that purpose. But woops I guess that can lead to issues like Canada's genocidal boarding schools

I don't care about hearing arguments against this but I also don't expect to hear one that isn't rhetorically similar to 99% of conservative shit appealing to tradition or whatever nonsense. Like 90% of people on this site have extreme issues with their relationships with their parents and im just saying it could all be avoided by simply not having parents!

[-] godlessworm@hexbear.net 3 points 3 weeks ago

im gonna keep it real with you comrade, i think your view on this is coming from some sort of personal issues that need to be addressed with your parents or in therapy rather than extrapolating that to "people shouldn't be allowed to be parents". has nothing to do with tradition or conservatism lol

[-] LeeeroooyJeeenkiiins@hexbear.net 6 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

nothing to do with tradition or conservatism

give an argument for parenthood by random people qualified only by being able to and consenting to sex with each other (who might not even want kids) that doesn't boil down to "it's nature/natural/tradition/the way it's always been," tell me how it's an active good for society to essentially have children be raised by children being raised by children in an unbroken line of fucked up parental "mistakes" that could be avoided by not leaving parenting up to flimsy feel good wishy washy "oh we're just born to be parents" bullshit

some sort of personal issues that need to be addressed with your parents

let me just ignore the like dozen comrades I've seen on here very vocally talk about their conservative brainrotted parents and their tribulations with them because it's gotta be just me, every trans person on here whose parents view them in unspeakably evil terms are definitely benefitted by having such a close and interpersonal relationship with their parents. Of my 5 close coworkers in the back, 3 have similar severe issues (one has "dad left the family" issues) and the other two are old white men who I'm sure have similar issues on top of fucking up their own children with their own issues

maybe instead of having a society who needs professional therapy for their fucked up parental relationships we should have professional parenting and skip the generation after generation after generation of trauma

i love that parenting is such a difficult task and here you are saying "um no actually you need less training than a forklift driver and this is good actually, go to therapy"

[-] godlessworm@hexbear.net 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

for everything you're typing, it basically boils down to "nobody should be allowed to be parents because i didn't like mine and lots of people didn't like theirs either".

ok. lots of people do like their parents, do have good relationships with them, and are love and taught well by them. lots of parents do put in the effort and time and care to raise someone and teach them

yeah like i said this is something that should be worked out in therapy comrade.

[-] LeeeroooyJeeenkiiins@hexbear.net 5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

cool story enjoy your idealism

[-] godlessworm@hexbear.net 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

lol that's not idealism. just because you have a bad relationship with your parents doesn't mean people shouldn't be allowed to be parents. if you said this shit to someone from a loving family who respects and loves their parents and has those feelings reciprocated do you think they would think you're saying anything worth considering?

you also can't take what is basically a eugenicist position and then say "but anybody who calls it eugenics is x y or z".

i notice a lot of "my personal problem is actually a problem with everybody else" here. with that being said, i guess this is a good time to disengage

this post was submitted on 23 Nov 2025
102 points (96.4% liked)

Chapotraphouse

14204 readers
803 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS