453
submitted 1 day ago by alessandro@lemmy.ca to c/pcgaming@lemmy.ca
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] OpticalMoose@discuss.tchncs.de 49 points 1 day ago

"We need to develop a one universal standard that covers everyone's use cases."

[-] _stranger_@lemmy.world 2 points 13 hours ago

They did, it was displayport. HDMI actively removes features the TV makers don't want you to have.

It exists. It’s Display Port.

[-] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The use case of "make a shit ton of money licensing a proprietary standard" is kind of mutually exclusive with other use cases. It would be hard to cover.

At the time, there were too many standards. But looking back from today, we see that standardization does eventually occur, it just takes time.

this post was submitted on 06 Dec 2025
453 points (99.3% liked)

PC Gaming

12880 readers
604 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS