The market speaks.
Saw this evil piece today from some engineering nerd who believes they're at the peak of critical thought.
For too long, these colleges have clung to the notion of being uniquely “noble”, insulated from market pressures and buffered by government funding and external endowments.
A particularly stubborn myth is that liberal arts education has a monopoly on cultivating critical thinking. This belief not only discounts the intellectual rigour demanded in Stem fields but also perpetuates an outdated hierarchy of disciplines. Critical thinking is not the sole attribute of literature and philosophy department
Rather than worry about funding cuts or condemning their threat to academic purity, liberal arts institutions should embrace a market-oriented mindset.
Fears about “dumbing down” degrees or commodifying education can be addressed through market accountability and employer feedback.
Now I'm no longer in school, it's been years. And I know there are a range of "sympathies" toward higher education (ideological state apparatuses and all that jazz), and I could also imagine good points being made about the need for better engineering in the United States and the west.
But I still hated this article telling schools to bow down to the free market, shut down their English departments, and recognize the engineers at Palantir as the pinnacle of human thought.
do you even hate liberal arts simply because it had 'liberal' in the name?
every week i have to defend myself for having a liberal arts degree in my maoist guerilla cell's struggle sessions
it's in polisci and my advisor was a literal hoxhaist but LiBeRUL is in the name and they won't stop bullying me
You can tell this is a bit because polisci is fully consumed by the foreign policy blob. Or you had one of very few professors whose research focus wasn't finding a ten thousandth way to say "bomb Iran".
so you're a liberal arts student (s in a student who happens to have a 'liberal arts' degree)?
No, and the liberal arts theoretically are cool and good and more people should receive a "liberal" education by that definition of liberal, the issue is that the people deciding what is taught are incentivized to make unhelpful decisions:
https://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1914/mar/11.htm
And I don't just mean refutations of socialism, though those abound, I mean more general wrong-headedness that is prolific in colleges in neoliberal society.
Philo 101 pop test! No freethinking answers allowed, but you may use your book! 😄
more like "DON'T use your book, but freethinking is the way to go!"
This is exactly it because science and math are both liberal arts lmao