597
submitted 1 year ago by BrikoX@lemmy.zip to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] silent_water@hexbear.net 39 points 1 year ago
[-] HughJanus@lemmy.ml -2 points 1 year ago

Police don't need exceptions for anyone.

[-] silent_water@hexbear.net 37 points 1 year ago
[-] HughJanus@lemmy.ml -3 points 1 year ago

So then we agree this is nothing to do with 2SLGBTQI+ people?

[-] silent_water@hexbear.net 38 points 1 year ago

the relevant states have made a legal push to criminalize being queer in public

[-] HughJanus@lemmy.ml -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You're like a professional goal post mover. What does that have to do with the police?

[-] Outdoor_Catgirl@hexbear.net 30 points 1 year ago

What do laws have to do with police?

Lobotomized level of take

[-] HughJanus@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago

You literally just misquoted me. If your intention was to completely misrepresent my position for the purposes of...? Good job!

[-] ShimmeringKoi@hexbear.net 25 points 1 year ago
[-] HughJanus@lemmy.ml -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

But it's not legal. And as we've already covered, they don't need it to be.

[-] silent_water@hexbear.net 28 points 1 year ago

legal and extralegal actions by the police are both effectively legal in the US because we effectively don't prosecute police. as the laws illegalize queerness, what actions the police are permitted to take expands.

[-] HughJanus@lemmy.ml -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

"Effectively legal" is not remotely the same thing as "legal". Do the cops kill all sorts of people unjustly? Yes. That's not the conversation we are having right now. The conversation we are having pertains to being queer in America and it's supposed dangers. And not just "dangerous" but dangerous to the extent that a country issues a warning to a group of people about literally just entering an entire country of 300 million people.

[-] silent_water@hexbear.net 31 points 1 year ago

completely missing the point to defend hate crimes. shocking

[-] HughJanus@lemmy.ml -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Completely derailing the conversation in order to "win" an irrelevant one. Shocking.

[-] silent_water@hexbear.net 27 points 1 year ago

trying to survive is winning, you're right

[-] AcidSmiley@hexbear.net 26 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The derailing started as soon as you entered the thread, you bellend.

[-] ThereRisesARedStar@hexbear.net 28 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

"Effectively legal" is not remotely the same thing as "legal"

It effectively is the same; hence "effectively legal"

[-] Kuori@hexbear.net 27 points 1 year ago

being queer in America and it's supposed dangers

drown in your own piss, dickless

[-] HughJanus@lemmy.ml -2 points 1 year ago

Exactly the kind of reply I'd expect from people like you

[-] silent_water@hexbear.net 25 points 1 year ago

yeah, you're right. it's exactly the kind of reply debate perverts masking their bigotry deserve.

[-] ThereRisesARedStar@hexbear.net 24 points 1 year ago

Exactly the kind of reply I'd expect from a liberal being insulted after they deny violence is happening against minorities.

[-] WoofWoof91@hexbear.net 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

the american education system in action folks

[-] silent_water@hexbear.net 20 points 1 year ago

they're not sending their best

[-] silent_water@hexbear.net 18 points 1 year ago
[-] HughJanus@lemmy.ml -2 points 1 year ago

See my other reply.

this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2023
597 points (94.9% liked)

World News

32378 readers
657 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS