100
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 17 Dec 2025
100 points (100.0% liked)
World News
3030 readers
56 users here now
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
This is an interesting post that I found on X. Hope you all like it:
Brief teaser:
spoiler
A “total and complete blockade” is not sanctions. It is not pressure. It is not rhetoric. Under international law, it is an act of war. When a U.S. president publicly declares a naval blockade by social media decree, boasting of armadas and asserting entitlement to another nation’s oil, minerals and land, this is not strength on display, it is madness, pure and unvarnished, masquerading as manifest authority.
Blockades are not metaphors. They are violence waiting for a trigger. They must be enforced. Enforcement means interception, boarding, seizure or gunfire. It means captains who hesitate, ships that refuse to stop, moments where a single miscalculation turns doctrine into disaster. History offers no comfort here, once a blockade is declared, a state either escalates or humiliates itself. There is no stable middle ground. Only collision.
This is gunboat diplomacy ripped from the age of empires and dragged, screaming, into a world that has outgrown it. Blockades are what powers reach for when persuasion fails, legitimacy rots, and law becomes an obstacle rather than a shield. They are not instruments of order. They are confessions — public admissions that the system being defended no longer functions.
And let’s strip away the theater, this is not about Venezuela. Venezuela is the stage, not the target. The target is precedent. If tankers can be seized, governments branded “terrorist” by decree, and economies threatened with strangulation absent mandate or law, then the message is unmistakable. Sovereignty inside the Western system is provisional. Property exists only until it is needed. Law applies, until it doesn’t.
Europe knows exactly where this road leads — because it helped pave it. By normalizing extra-jurisdictional asset freezes and sovereign confiscation, it surrendered the moral and legal ground it pretends to stand on. A continent that transformed financial piracy into policy now watches blockade language return, trapped by the precedents it set itself. This is not neutrality. It is self-entrapment. And history has never been gentle with those who abandon law first and plead for it later.
This is why the world is moving, not loudly, not ideologically, but decisively, away from Western finance, Western shipping lanes, Western courts, Western assurances. Not out of rebellion, but self-preservation. When contracts dissolve into confiscation and diplomacy collapses into maritime threats, the response is automatic: parallel trade same security structures, parallel systems. Multipolarity is not a dream. It is a survival reflex.
What we are witnessing is not dominance. It is exposure. An exhausted empire reverting to ultimatums because persuasion no longer works, law no longer convinces, and fear no longer freezes the room. Blockades do not restore a failing order. They announce that order has already died. And when a power must threaten the world’s arteries to prove it still matters, the verdict is no longer approaching.
It has already been delivered.
Source -> https://xcancel.com/islanderworld/status/2001138008578232523
Gunboat diplomacy never went away, its perpetrators just used other justifications for the same thing. Fighting communism (Korea, Vietnam) and terrorism (Afghanistan, Syria, Yemen), claiming that countries are "dictatorships" and have to be liberated (Iraq, Libya, Cuba), using mercenary groups like the Contras (Nicaragua), having presidents do it and then meekly apologize (W. Bush, Obama), claiming that countries are developing nuclear weapons (Iraq, Iran) have all happened, and I consider it identical to gunboat diplomacy. The tactics are almost entirely identical (invasion, overthrow, installing dictatorships), and its causes are the same (resources to be delivered to Imperial countries).
There is however obvious evidence of these excuses being more and more flimsy, and history being rewritten. That is from the desparation of Capitalism in decay.
AI text
I don't think it is though. Also, if your objective is to distract the attention instead of engaging with the message of the text, please don't.
It is of bad taste.
Actual presence of AI would be something that says a lot but has no actual ideas, because AI cannot understand and communicate actual ideas. I however do have some criticisms against small things in the text.
until you said that I didn't even realize it, but now I can't unsee it, emdashes and all
dawg the presence of em dashes is not an indication of AI
i have been using em dashes since before LLMs were a thing
who cares