How many more "socialists" do you guys need to elect before it stops being a struggle session every damned time (hexbear.net)

submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by Andrzej3K@hexbear.net to c/chapotraphouse@hexbear.net

94 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Do you know how often bourgeois democracies elect "socialists"? Hell, many of them even elect "communists" on the regular. It's normal. Get over it. Please.

EDIT - there are basically two main genres of Mamdani poster, both of which keep scrawling MAMDANI on the wall in their own excrement for different reasons, and they all seem to be assuming I am from the other side lol

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] TreadOnMe@hexbear.net 16 points 1 month ago

Idk, how many 'socialists' immediately use their new-found position to undermine the international position of the organization that raises them up? The reason third world communist elected people are pretty non-controversial is because they don't tend to do that.

this post was submitted on 18 Dec 2025

98 points (99.0% liked)

Chapotraphouse

14257 readers

777 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

LENINSGHOSTFACEKILLA@hexbear.net

corgiwithalaptop@hexbear.net

a_little_red_rat@hexbear.net

khizuo@hexbear.net

thelastaxolotl@hexbear.net

CoolerOpposide@hexbear.net