89

A reminder that as the US continues to threaten countries around the world, fedposting is to be very much avoided (even with qualifiers like "in Minecraft") and comments containing it will be removed.

Image is of Donald Trump, Paul Kagame, and Felix Tshisekedi signing a peace deal in Washington DC on December 4th.


On December 4th, Rwanda's Paul Kagame and the DRC's Felix Tshisekedi signed the Washington Accords for Peace and Prosperity (pictured above). Trump boasted that he was settling a war that had gone on for decades, and remarked, idiosyncratically, "[...] and now they’re going to spend a lot of time hugging, holding hands [...]"

A few days later, the M23 militia (backed by Rwanda) advanced into Uvira, a city near the DRC's eastern border with Burundi and a major commercial and strategic location in the region. Burundi, although a small country, is a significant ally to the DRC and has sent thousands of soldiers to aid them during conflicts; this offensive by M23 aims to cut off a direct route between the two, though they do still share quite a long border over Lake Tanganyika. Tens of thousands of civilians (possibly up to 200,000) fled as M23 approached.

Signed almost simultaneously with the Accords was a Strategic Partnership Agreement between the DRC and the United States, which effectively threw open its critical minerals in the east to American exploitation. These minerals include tin, tungsten, and tantalum, which is vital for many industries. The irony is that M23 has been taking territory in the eastern DRC in order to transport these very minerals to Rwanda and onwards to global supply chains. Signing the Accord was, therefore, a remarkably pointless endeavour for everybody involved. Burundi and the DRC have complained, calling for sanctions on Rwanda, and appeasing to Trump's pride, calling this a "slap in the face to the United States", though I doubt the US is ultimately all that bothered about it one way or another.


Last week's thread is here. The Imperialism Reading Group is here.

Please check out the RedAtlas!

The bulletins site is here. Currently not used.
The RSS feed is here. Also currently not used.

The Zionist Entity's Genocide of Palestine

If you have evidence of Zionist crimes and atrocities that you wish to preserve, there is a thread here in which to do so.

Sources on the fighting in Palestine against the temporary Zionist entity. In general, CW for footage of battles, explosions, dead people, and so on:

UNRWA reports on Israel's destruction and siege of Gaza and the West Bank.

English-language Palestinian Marxist-Leninist twitter account. Alt here.
English-language twitter account that collates news.
Arab-language twitter account with videos and images of fighting.
English-language (with some Arab retweets) Twitter account based in Lebanon. - Telegram is @IbnRiad.
English-language Palestinian Twitter account which reports on news from the Resistance Axis. - Telegram is @EyesOnSouth.
English-language Twitter account in the same group as the previous two. - Telegram here.

Mirrors of Telegram channels that have been erased by Zionist censorship.

Russia-Ukraine Conflict

Examples of Ukrainian Nazis and fascists
Examples of racism/euro-centrism during the Russia-Ukraine conflict

Sources:

Defense Politics Asia's youtube channel and their map. Their youtube channel has substantially diminished in quality but the map is still useful.
Moon of Alabama, which tends to have interesting analysis. Avoid the comment section.
Understanding War and the Saker: reactionary sources that have occasional insights on the war.
Alexander Mercouris, who does daily videos on the conflict. While he is a reactionary and surrounds himself with likeminded people, his daily update videos are relatively brainworm-free and good if you don't want to follow Russian telegram channels to get news. He also co-hosts The Duran, which is more explicitly conservative, racist, sexist, transphobic, anti-communist, etc when guests are invited on, but is just about tolerable when it's just the two of them if you want a little more analysis.
Simplicius, who publishes on Substack. Like others, his political analysis should be soundly ignored, but his knowledge of weaponry and military strategy is generally quite good.
On the ground: Patrick Lancaster, an independent and very good journalist reporting in the warzone on the separatists' side.

Unedited videos of Russian/Ukrainian press conferences and speeches.

Pro-Russian Telegram Channels:

Again, CW for anti-LGBT and racist, sexist, etc speech, as well as combat footage.

https://t.me/aleksandr_skif ~ DPR's former Defense Minister and Colonel in the DPR's forces. Russian language.
https://t.me/Slavyangrad ~ A few different pro-Russian people gather frequent content for this channel (~100 posts per day), some socialist, but all socially reactionary. If you can only tolerate using one Russian telegram channel, I would recommend this one.
https://t.me/s/levigodman ~ Does daily update posts.
https://t.me/patricklancasternewstoday ~ Patrick Lancaster's telegram channel.
https://t.me/gonzowarr ~ A big Russian commentator.
https://t.me/rybar ~ One of, if not the, biggest Russian telegram channels focussing on the war out there. Actually quite balanced, maybe even pessimistic about Russia. Produces interesting and useful maps.
https://t.me/epoddubny ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/boris_rozhin ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/mod_russia_en ~ Russian Ministry of Defense. Does daily, if rather bland updates on the number of Ukrainians killed, etc. The figures appear to be approximately accurate; if you want, reduce all numbers by 25% as a 'propaganda tax', if you don't believe them. Does not cover everything, for obvious reasons, and virtually never details Russian losses.
https://t.me/UkraineHumanRightsAbuses ~ Pro-Russian, documents abuses that Ukraine commits.

Pro-Ukraine Telegram Channels:

Almost every Western media outlet.
https://discord.gg/projectowl ~ Pro-Ukrainian OSINT Discord.
https://t.me/ice_inii ~ Alleged Ukrainian account with a rather cynical take on the entire thing.


you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] insurgentrat@hexbear.net 8 points 1 day ago

As I say in the OP, instead of having some coherent platform against right wing violence they're suppressing pro Palestinian protests and adopting fringe Zionist positions on antisemitism.

Daesh did kill a lot of people at their peak, and destroy a lot of irreplaceable cultural heritage, and broke up families. They just mostly hurt other Muslims so the awareness of their horror didn't penetrate as far in MSM in the anglosphere.

I am not interested in constructing some flawless argument in an offhand comment. I just think it's fucking disgusting to attack people for their religious, cultural, or ethnic affiliation on the assumption they are somehow guilty because people claiming to represent them on said base are fucking lunatics.

Claiming that idk because some people in a crowd that somewhat shot into might have been horrible and that somehow makes the act less bad is an absolutely hideous thing to bring up and plays into the hands of the genocidal maniacs in Israel claiming it's somehow in the Jewish diaspora common culture to be senseless butchers of Palestinian people.

There are Zionists and antizionists in Australia, some are Jewish on both sides. Shit the premier of NSW is a Zionist and he's some Irish decendent Catholic bible thumping weirdo and he's one of the most ardent Zionists in the NSW public sphere.

[-] LeninWeave@hexbear.net 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Daesh did kill a lot of people at their peak, and destroy a lot of irreplaceable cultural heritage, and broke up families. They just mostly hurt other Muslims so the awareness of their horror didn't penetrate as far in MSM in the anglosphere.

I'm aware, but as you say, they did it mostly to Muslims (and Christians + other minorities in West Asia), who are typically not the perpetrators of the mosque shootings in the west you were referring to. Daesh attacks against crackers (who do that kind of shooting) were extremely few. So your analogy didn't make sense to me as a comparison to this attack.

Edit: clarified the above paragraph a bit.

Claiming that idk because some people in a crowd that somewhat shot into might have been horrible and that somehow makes the act less bad is an absolutely hideous thing to bring up and plays into the hands of the genocidal maniacs in Israel claiming it's somehow in the Jewish diaspora common culture to be senseless butchers of Palestinian people.

There are Zionists and antizionists in Australia, some are Jewish on both sides. Shit the premier of NSW is a Zionist and he's some Irish decendent Catholic bible thumping weirdo and he's one of the most ardent Zionists in the NSW public sphere.

I agree. But you can't make an analysis where you ignore that Chabad are genocidal zionists and that's almost certainly part of the reason this congregation in particular was attacked. Again, that doesn't make it right (even if all those present were zionists, which is definitely not the case because some were children), but it is reality. And as long as the "Israeli" state continues this genocide, this type of thing will happen more and more frequently. This isn't even the first Chabad congregation that was targeted, it happened in Manchester a few months ago. The point being that it can hardly be said conclusively that this was done only for reasons of ethnic hatred.

Of course, as you say, the people who did this are cooked Daesh sympathizers, they definitely ALSO did it for hateful reasons. No one does something like this without being completely cooked regardless, this kind of adventurist violence is not the actions of organized and principled political actors.

[-] insurgentrat@hexbear.net 6 points 1 day ago
this post was submitted on 15 Dec 2025
89 points (100.0% liked)

news

24484 readers
608 users here now

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed.

All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body.

If you are citing a Twitter post as news, please include not just the twitter.com URL but also Xcancel.com (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance, such as Libredirect or archive them as you would any other reactionary source (archive.today, web.archive.org, ghostarchive.org). Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed.

Mass-tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken Markov chain bot will result in a comm ban.

Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.

Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned.

Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS