608
How about the digestive system?
(feddit.org)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 27 Dec 2025
608 points (95.5% liked)
Science Memes
17895 readers
2209 users here now
Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!
A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.
Rules
- Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
- Keep it rooted (on topic).
- No spam.
- Infographics welcome, get schooled.
This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.
Research Committee
Other Mander Communities
Science and Research
Biology and Life Sciences
- !abiogenesis@mander.xyz
- !animal-behavior@mander.xyz
- !anthropology@mander.xyz
- !arachnology@mander.xyz
- !balconygardening@slrpnk.net
- !biodiversity@mander.xyz
- !biology@mander.xyz
- !biophysics@mander.xyz
- !botany@mander.xyz
- !ecology@mander.xyz
- !entomology@mander.xyz
- !fermentation@mander.xyz
- !herpetology@mander.xyz
- !houseplants@mander.xyz
- !medicine@mander.xyz
- !microscopy@mander.xyz
- !mycology@mander.xyz
- !nudibranchs@mander.xyz
- !nutrition@mander.xyz
- !palaeoecology@mander.xyz
- !palaeontology@mander.xyz
- !photosynthesis@mander.xyz
- !plantid@mander.xyz
- !plants@mander.xyz
- !reptiles and amphibians@mander.xyz
Physical Sciences
- !astronomy@mander.xyz
- !chemistry@mander.xyz
- !earthscience@mander.xyz
- !geography@mander.xyz
- !geospatial@mander.xyz
- !nuclear@mander.xyz
- !physics@mander.xyz
- !quantum-computing@mander.xyz
- !spectroscopy@mander.xyz
Humanities and Social Sciences
Practical and Applied Sciences
- !exercise-and sports-science@mander.xyz
- !gardening@mander.xyz
- !self sufficiency@mander.xyz
- !soilscience@slrpnk.net
- !terrariums@mander.xyz
- !timelapse@mander.xyz
Memes
Miscellaneous
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
The colloquial meaning is different from a topological definition. Anything with a through-hole has a hole at each end. It's an ambiguous question because the answer depends whether you're referring to a openings in the face of the object (a cylinder in the case of a straw) or the void connecting the surface openings. Perhaps the safest answer is inclusive, so three. I've been told I'm not fun at parties.
You could make infinite indentations in an object with zero holes. That's a very poor definition for a hope topologically.
Openings and indentations aren't the same thing though, are they?
Correct, a hole is a topological feature.
I'll give it a try and get back to you
And yet each indentation could hold something, like cheese or a kitten, so each indentation in functionally different from a smooth surface.
Deforming a shape changes it, thus topology is a special case of specifically ignoring most aspects of a shape.
But more importantly, calling any indentation a "hole" is a case of specifically ignoring the special significance of actual holes. You can't pass through an indentation.
Guess I can't dig holes either
Sure you can, they just gotta come out the other side. Otherwise it's just a fancy divot
ill put a fancy divot in yah dome wit my 9 millie brah
Watch out, we got a badass over here
please dont be mean I was trying to be gangsta ok
im white and in my 40s
There's a Weird Al song about you. Or three.
Me, too, which is why I don't say silly things like that
well I been learned, thank you. im a smarter, wiser, and better person now due to your tutelage 🙏
edit: spelling (of course)
Shame on you for wanting to have fun in a meme post! Shame, I say!
If you were to tell an average English speaker that you were going to dig an indentation, chances are high that they would misinterpret your meaning.
On the other hand, if you told them that you were going to dig a "blind hole," I imagine they would have a much better understanding of your meaning and you would still be technically correct.
That's part of why I try not to talk to average English speakers
Haha fair enough
That's why we have the compound word "through-hole".
90% of important parts on living things are pockets and manipulations of surface area, two things completely ignored by topology. Topology is interesting mathematically, and has meaning for traversal and knot problems, but it's not really useful to describe reality.
Skill issue
really
Topology is immensely useful to describe reality.
This is just not true.
What topology does for people practically, is it allows them to do a rough kind of geometric reasoning in a wide variety of cases. Further, the geometric notions defined via topology subsume many of the more intuitive notions you might already know of from the number line or the plane.
For example, continuity of functions, convergence of sequences, interiors and boundaries of sets, connectedness and many other things are inherently topological notions that any person who has taken a typical calculus sequence should have some intuitive idea of.
One of the biggest difference between actual pure topology and analysis is that analysis is just done in the context of really nice types of topological spaces called metric spaces in which notions of distance are available.
Any time people are using results of calculus in the sciences, under the hood they are using details about topology on R^n.
That's why we have a diverse set of words such as "divot," "indentation," "pit," "well," and so much more!
Topology is a component of the language called "mathematics" we use to understand, describe, and model reality in concrete terms.
But it's a good definition if you are, say, putting a thing into each indentation. That's why the two definitions are different.
Right, those wouldn't be holes.
You seem to not be getting that words can have multiple (even if related) meanings. When some science or other discipline takes a common word and defines it really precisely for their purposes, that doesn't change the definition of the common word for all usages and mandate that all lay people use it only with that discipline's more precise definition.
Better precision leads to better communication.
Quite true. It is also important to know the limits of the precision you are going to be getting.
It’s ok, the people who tell you that weren’t invited to any of the parties either.
I love the unabashed sharing of topical knowledge, so you're welcome to my party.
That's right you're not let me help:
"The ~~colloquial~~ cloaca meaning is different from a ~~topological~~ Topsy-turvy definition. Anything with a through-hole has a hole at each end^snickering^. It's an ~~ambiguous~~ GAY question because the answer depends whether you're referring to a openings in the face of the object^more-snickering^ ~~(a cylinder in the case of a straw)~~^obviously-unnecessary^ or the void connection the surface openings. Perhaps the ~~safest~~ most radical answer is inclusive, so three. I've been told I'm ~~not~~ fun at parties.'