600
submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by marcie@lemmy.ml to c/linux@lemmy.ml

https://github.com/ublue-os/countme/blob/main/growth_global.svg

Graphs can be found here on their github. Since around mid November the active user count for Bazzite has gone up by around 16k active users.

Personally, my only wish for Bazzite is a Cosmic version šŸ‘¼ I tried it out recently and it seems fairly impressive

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] victorz@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago

I'm surprised people are so keen on these gaming-focused distros.

I just want a great, general-purpose computing system that can do gaming as well. 😁

[-] ada@piefed.blahaj.zone 29 points 1 day ago

It's not so much that people are focused on gaming distros, it's more that gaming distros historically haven't been much of a thing, and gamers generally had to use windows for their gaming, because the linux experience was limited and sub-optimal. Even dedicated linux users would keep a windows partition/machine that they used for gaming.

That's not true anymore, as basically anything without kernel level anti cheat works on linux, which means that a huge amount of folk that would have moved to linux earlier, but couldn't, are now coming over.

Which is to say, it's not so much that there is "so many of them", it's more that, they're coming over in a big wave, because they've been there for years, but haven't been able to move until recently, and now, they know that there are distros out there that look and feel like something they're familiar with.

[-] victorz@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

I guess we have different use cases is all. People who primarily use their computers for gaming.

My PC is:

  1. My media server
  2. My workstation when WFH
  3. My entertainment center if the TV is busy
  4. My gaming PC
  5. My hobby development PC

(In no particular order.)

[-] sam@piefed.ca 24 points 1 day ago

Most people I know primarily use their desktop computers for games. Bazzite also works great for general purpose computing, although it isn't advertised as such.

[-] Holytimes@sh.itjust.works 1 points 8 hours ago

It's like gaming laptops. The concept of something being "gaming" focused is nonsense bullshit pr spin.

If it's good at gaming it's basically just good at everything. But people gobble up gaming like leds on a serect lab chair.

[-] sam@piefed.ca 2 points 8 hours ago

TIL chairs have LEDs now

[-] dajoho@sh.itjust.works 4 points 19 hours ago

Agreed. Bloody fantastic for general purpose. Seems like a well kept secret. A lot of people assume Bazzite is just Steam in Big-Screen mode.

[-] JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl 3 points 18 hours ago

For some things.

For many things it isn't. It is usable (I use it) but with a bunch of workarounds for anything embedded development-related since it needs specific vendor software with device access. I have had to use a variety of distrobox + app image solutions that are often a bit worse than a system that installs them as native apps.

[-] sam@piefed.ca 6 points 14 hours ago

I don't personally count "embedded development-related" as "general computing" so I think there's a disconnect there. šŸ˜…

[-] MangoPenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 1 day ago

A gaming focused distro will do everything else well too, so thats probably why.

[-] DillingerEscape@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

Universal Blue is the project which maintains Bazzite and other brilliant immutable images based on Fedora Silverblue (Gnome) and Fedora Kinoite (KDE)

Bazzite has Steam bundled in the image which is a bit better for performance, Bazzite-dx is Bazzite with devtools.

Aurora is another image made for general computing, Steam is installed as a Flatpak with a little worse performance but not much

Bluefin is your typical dev-workstation

If you’re serious about gaming I recommend KDE as your desktop environment, plays nicer with HDR, VRR and fractional scaling than Gnome.

[-] Holytimes@sh.itjust.works -1 points 8 hours ago

Generally your life is improved any time you choose to not engage with gnome or it's nonsense. It's a good rule of thumb for everything Linux related.

Gnome is just bad apple.

[-] victorz@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Why is Flatpak Steam worse for performance? I've been using it for years, seemingly better performance than Windows on the same system. Something inherent about Flatpak?

If you’re serious about gaming I recommend KDE as your desktop environment, plays nicer with HDR, VRR and fractional scaling than Gnome.

Mm, I don't think I'd be willing to sacrifice my Niri workflow. Niri also supports fractional scaling and VRR, but not yet HDR, which I can live without until it's implemented. 😁

[-] BaroqueInMind@piefed.social 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

Flatpak is simply a sandboxed application, similar to a Docker container. Its better to have natively installed applications over sandboxed if you are seeking the highest level of performance.

You have essentially made all your games run within a sandboxed instance which has a limited set of binaries that emulate another mini OS within your primary OS.

If you haven't seen any performance issues, then keep on doing what you're doing, the software is very well made compared to Ubuntu Snap and likely has similar driver performance as close as possible to bare-metal

[-] victorz@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago

essentially made all your games run within a sandboxed instance which has a limited set of binaries that emulate another mini OS within your primary OS.

Isn't it just library bundling? It's not like it's running inside a virtual machine or anything.

I can see the Rocket League process right there when listing my user processes, e.g.

There are so many conflicting reports regarding the performance on Flatpak, for Steam but also in general, so I don't know what to believe.

At least one source said the performance overhead is negligible on modern hardware, so I think I'm gucci.

[-] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 2 points 21 hours ago

Flatpak is simply a sandboxed application, similar to a Docker container. Its better to have natively installed applications over sandboxed if you are seeking the highest level of performance.

This is bullshit. Containers run natively on your system just like "native" [sic] applications.

[-] BaroqueInMind@piefed.social 1 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

They literally say they are a fucking container tool like Docker in their own FAQ , you silly person.

[-] markstos@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

That’s not what the FAQ says, rather it says Flatpaks are often sandboxed but not fully containerized. Containers don’t need to have a performance penalty because they run on the same kernel as the host. Container tech applies a chroot, disables some capabilities within the container and that’s about it. They are in contrast to virtual machines that need to boot an entire additional OS before doing anything.

[-] BaroqueInMind@piefed.social 1 points 3 hours ago

Looks like I don't understand how it works and should simply shut the fuck up instead of spreading nonsense.

[-] victorz@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago

That's not what they were refuting. They were just saying that containers run on the metal just like any other software.

šŸ™‚

[-] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 3 points 19 hours ago

Read again. You completely misunderstood.

[-] BaroqueInMind@piefed.social 1 points 4 hours ago

What's a container that doesn't run natively on the system called?

[-] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 hours ago

There is no such thing.

Containers are just separated from the rest of your system by cgroups. You can even see the executable running in containers with ps and top. They're native binaries running on the same kernel as the rest of your system.

[-] BaroqueInMind@piefed.social 1 points 3 hours ago
[-] Cyber@feddit.uk 9 points 1 day ago

Yeah, I'm the same, but if it's an easy way to get people into the warm embrace of Linux, then hopefully they'll look around and see other (Gen Purpose) distros exist.

[-] XiELEd@piefed.social 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

To be fair some of these distros centered on gaming may really have some priorities that are more useful for gamers. Like better driver and system support. And I think they're still capable of doing well outside of gaming.

[-] victorz@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

True. Let's hope it's a great stepping-stone. šŸ˜ŠšŸ‘

[-] chaosCruiser@futurology.today 4 points 1 day ago

In my experience, Debian has been very low maintenance. Occasionally, you may run into an issue that would be solved by having newer packages. If that happens, consider switching to Fedora.

My Fedora installations have been pretty smooth. The only thing that always breaks randomly is the software update GUI. I just got fed up with that and ended up using the terminal for installing all updates. Apparently this distro requires a bit more maintenance.

[-] victorz@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Fedora installations have been pretty smooth.

ended up using the terminal for installing all updates.

My experience as well with my Arch installations after a decade with that distro. I run a system upgrade because I want to, not because I need to. Never does it break unless I'm careless when upgrading and not checking the news page beforehand, which you are supposed to do. As long as I play by the rules, it's super stable. (Never did it break for me anyway though. Never happened apart from hardware failure.)

Although admittedly I almost never do check the news page before upgrading, but/because there's rarely anything there. And after a while you learn to recognize the volatile packages which can break your system, so e.g. if systemd has an update I'll check the page before hitting enter, and so on.

[-] chaosCruiser@futurology.today 2 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

Remember this one from 2022?

Yeah, that one ended up being a learning experience… After recovering from that dumb misadventure, I finally learned to take those announcements more seriously.

[-] victorz@lemmy.world 3 points 20 hours ago

Yeah, vaguely šŸ˜… I use syslinux for booting, habit from when I used to dual boot, so I was luckily not affected. But yes, it is definitely wise to check the news before upgrading system-critical packages!

[-] chaosCruiser@futurology.today 3 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

I can't be bothered to update every day, or even every week. LOL. More like once a month or so, which means that it's usually 100 MB or more and there's at least one package that is more or less critical. When I start updating, and before hitting Y, I pause for a second and realise I should totally check the news first. Usually, it's fine, but over the years, there have been a few times when intervention was necessary.

[-] victorz@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago

If you only update once a month (which should be fine as well, definitely), then you only need to check the news page once a month too, less often than I do probably. šŸ˜„ Seems like a win-win. šŸ‘Œ

You can also selectively update packages of course, but this is strongly ill-advised unless you know what you're doing.

But like, doas pacman -Sy firefox should be fine...

You didn't hear it from me. 🤐🄸

[-] chaosCruiser@futurology.today 1 points 7 hours ago

The ā€œunless you know what you’re doingā€ part tells me it’s totally worth it in some highly exceptional situations. You just need to be able to justify spending a few hours to figure out exactly how to do it safely.

Best thing about Linux is that you can do literally anything you want. If it works, it’s awesome. If you break your system, you get to keep the pieces and learn something new along the way.

I’m utilizing this liberty by being a lazy admin who updates things like eventuallyā„¢ or soonā„¢. Haven’t learned any hard lessons yet, so I guess it’s ok. Or maybe I just know what I’m doing…

[-] Kronusdark@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

Yea I bounced off Bazzite because I needed to run plex. And I couldn’t get a container to run reliably on it. It’s still a cool distro though.

Edit: typo

[-] Evotech@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Very easy with podman / quadlets

[-] MalReynolds@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

This. If you must have rooted containers docker-compose is only a

rpm-ostree install docker-compose

away, but that's a big ass layer, you'll feel it every update, and insecure to boot (yes I know docker finally got userspace, but how many times have you seen it used? Everywhere it's root.). Run your docker-compose file through podlet, and there you go, userspace quadlets (95+% of the time, every time...). They're easy to love once you get your head around them.

[-] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 4 points 21 hours ago

Yeah, this is the "fun" of bazite. If you want to do the things it does well (desktopy things) it works well. But then things that are trivial in other distros are a pain. And the "solution" is to actually run one of those other distros in a container. It's ridiculous.

Bazite is for people who want a computer to be like an iPhone near as I can tell.

[-] MalReynolds@slrpnk.net 3 points 20 hours ago

I think you as yet don't quite understand the full beauty of immutable distros. Running things in distroboxes, yeah even other distros, is not a bug, it's a feature (really) because you cannot break your main OS with a distrobox. As a developer it's a godsend, finnicky AI project that needs a specific version of python and CUDA drivers and only has instructions for Arch ? That's a distrobox, spin it up, play with it, archive it for later, put it away.

There's tiers in Bazzite, for GUI apps, flatpak, if what you want isn't there, it's in a distrobox Arch in AUR and you can integrate it as an application into the main OS. Stuff that truly needs system level access, like zsh and intel-undervolt gets layered into the main OS with rpm-ostree. There's security benefits as well like SELinux, but this post has gone on long enough.

It is so not an iPhone.

[-] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 0 points 19 hours ago

Distrobox is not a feature of immutable distros. It runs just fine on Debian. As does flatpak.

[-] MalReynolds@slrpnk.net 0 points 18 hours ago

Duh, but it shines in immutable. Enjoy your debian, I like it too, for servers.

[-] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 1 points 12 hours ago

It "shines"? It's the same thing.

load more comments (11 replies)
this post was submitted on 28 Dec 2025
600 points (98.9% liked)

Linux

57274 readers
828 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by AlpƔr-Etele MƩder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS