view the rest of the comments
politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
Harsh? Please. He tried to overthrow the government and he got less time than someone caught with a single joint in Mississippi
Pretty sure that's an exaggeration
I'll just leave this here then.
https://hightimes.com/news/mississippi-supreme-court-upholds-life-sentence-for-weed-possession/
https://www.nola.com/news/courts/a-life-sentence-for-20-of-weed-louisiana-stands-out-for-its-unequal-use-of/article_5f7931ca-5d17-11ec-bcd7-730a4fb99798.html
Again, they were not "just given harsh sentences because of having weed". Reoffending is the cause
So it's justified to throw someone away for the rest of their life because they smoked weed a few times but it's "harsh" to give someone 17 years for trying to overthrow the government?
Did they try to overthrow the government 5 times?
Ladies and gentlemen… I give you the party of ‘law and order’
Their laws and their Order.
↑
Can't
Understand
Normal
Thinking
You're clearly the one that doesn't understand how laws work. Reoffending is obviously more penalized than the first case, simple as that
You're clearly a repeat offender of being a fucking moron. I vote we lock you up for multiple decades.
Sticking people in cages with violent offenders for smoking a plant is both barbaric and unethical. You attempting to weasel around that and justify this nonsense is exactly what I would expect from someone as fucking stupid as you. Again, AND I ABSOLUTELY CANNOT STRESS THIS ENOUGH:
GET FUCKING WREKT YOU ABSOLUTE NOOB 🖕
Not knowing how laws work be like:
I understand how the law works. I just don't make pedantic arguments to justify governmental abuse over victimless crimes because I'm not a boot-licking goose-stepper like you.
If you knew how they work you wouldn't be crying about reoffending being more penalised
Ah, yes, because pointing out the generational injustices and ineffectiveness of the war on drugs absolutely makes me a whiny pussy.
Again, the fact you are willing to justify locking someone in prison over Cannabis use/possession at all shows what a backwards yokel you really are. Put whatever spin on it you like, you are still a moral degenerate no matter how you slice it.
The only thing degenerating here is your country's society
Yeah, because of people like you.
Oh so I'm an evil hooded guy manipulating all of America's society from outside? You're really overestimating my power
No, you're a small-minded, sycophantic, troll who seems perfectly fine with justifying inhumane behavior based on tired legal justifications that are neither ethical nor contemporaneously representative of the will of the majority.
Conservatism is deeply rooted in this kind of ideological sophistry, and in that way you are a perfect representative of your cause. While you may not be from the United States, you embody the same kind of energy as the conservative electorate here that votes against its own interest because they cannot see the forest through the trees.
"justifying inhumane behaviour" lol
And you still haven't answered why or how I am degenerating America
I said people like you, and I just explained what I meant by that.
I'm sorry you can't fucking read chief.
You still have to explain how
Actually, I don't. This has now become boring and tedious. If I see your stupid takes around again maybe I will hurl some more arguments your direction for meaningless internet points. But for now I'm going to go do something more productive.
It's been real, it's been fun, but it ain't been real fun 😘
Finally