671
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 19 points 2 days ago

Economics is just applied statistics with a little sociology mixed in

And simplified until linear relationships appear.

[-] Brainsploosh@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

To be fair, my engineering degree also did this.

Good thing I learnt that linearity in my chosen specialty only breaks down in the exotic circumstances of air, room temperature, 1 atm pressure, and distances of <0,5 m or >30 m.

[-] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

In college - Assume everything is linear

Later - Everything is not linear

Tell us you dont understand economics without telling us..

Supply demand curves are usually drawn with straight lines.

[-] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

never once in my economics education did they do that. not just because it's easier to draw a curve than a straight line, but because the shape of the curve defines the type of good. maybe your economics education was just... bad?

[-] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Supply and demand | Definition, Example, & Graph | Britannica Money

Type economics supply and demand curve into Google images for more data points than your personal experience.

[-] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

ooo, everyday people (not economists) can put bad images up on the internet

This is from an encyclopedia. Here's another

Did your economics training teach you to ignore data?

[-] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

let's talk about opportunity cost. did you learn that?

[-] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

first: neither brittanica nor investopedia are run by or written by economists. those images were made, probably in excel first, they're terrible, and then considered done. how much longer does it take to get a set of curves that line up precisely in the center versus a set of straight lines that line up precisely in the center? especially when the point you're trying to illustrate with your diagram is not (a) the more realistic shape of the utility curves that define the supply and demand curves, but is in fact (b) the equilibrium point at the intersection. it takes a lot longer to get the curves right, right? and that's not the important part of the model! better to just save 15 seconds and use straight lines, you can illustrate the curves on another diagram

that is how economists think

that is why those stupid images are there.

Economists make it linear again.

opportunity-cost-definition.png

[-] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Hilarious.

Check out the supply/demand Figure 4-8 on page 80

Economists can't handle non-linear relationships.

Prosecution rests.

[-] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

what is it trying to illustrate in the model?

I've made my point.

The example text book you pulled of the shelf written by "proper economists" has the exact same linear S/D diagram I posted at the top of this thread.

[-] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

so you can't figure out the point it's trying to illustrate by simplifying assumptions. tada!

[-] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

let me give you some advice. read the text instead of just skimming for pretty pictures. maybe next time you won't fail your economics class

never once in my economics education did they [draw straight lines].

It seems you are the one who should have paid attention in class.

[-] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

considering i'm the one who has experience in econometrics and you're arguing ITS ALL STRAIGHT LINES because you never got past that part, yeah no.

You have no academic experience. You can't even quote properly.

[-] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

sure dude sure. keep making stuff up.

Making stuff up is literally what I just accused you of.

Only you have written "ITS ALL STRAIGHT LINES".

I'd accuse you of being an LLM but no-one would train something to score this many own goals.

[-] counterfactual@sopuli.xyz 1 points 3 hours ago

You're so incredibly dumb, the flailing is hilarious. You wouldn't pass micro I, let alone macro.

[-] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago

Economics is just fascist sociology.

[-] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

maybe pay attention to more than chicago

this post was submitted on 26 Jan 2026
671 points (97.3% liked)

Science Memes

18406 readers
2682 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS