367
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2026
367 points (99.2% liked)
PC Gaming
13446 readers
809 users here now
For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki
Rules:
- Be Respectful.
- No Spam or Porn.
- No Advertising.
- No Memes.
- No Tech Support.
- No questions about buying/building computers.
- No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
- No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
- No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
- Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
The period during which working in game development could be considered somewhat theoretically reasonable to pursue as a career.
It has been plenty unreasonable to work for AAA game companies for a long time. Long crunch, layoffs between projects, abuse by managers has been widespread for like 15 years at least. And attempts to remedy these issues with collective bargaining has been met with obvious union busting for several years at least.
Perhaps your definition of a golden age existed and had ended, but if so the end was longer ago than you think and we're watching the end of an inevitable decline. You also have to compare this to everyone else's conditions. The fact "gig economy" is even in our lexicon should show how unstable tons of people's employment and income are.
I don't really disagree with this sentiment, my point is we risk losing the essential narrative of why what will occur or arguably already has occurred if we don't continually reemphasize the actual issue.