858
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] MrMetaKopos@slrpnk.net 14 points 1 month ago

Serious question. I was under the impression that all the people trafficked were girls. But there's a man raising his hand. Did Epstein also traffick boys? If so, I did not know that.

[-] Hadriscus@jlai.lu 33 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

This man is Virginia Giuffre's brother

[-] sommerset@thelemmy.club 6 points 1 month ago

She offed herself right? Was that real suicide or.....?

[-] Hadriscus@jlai.lu 8 points 1 month ago
[-] sommerset@thelemmy.club 0 points 1 month ago

As a parent myself - there is no way a mom of 3 offs herself.

[-] Hadriscus@jlai.lu 7 points 1 month ago

it happens. But I am dubious

[-] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago

There is if you're suffering from depression.

[-] Apytele@sh.itjust.works 28 points 1 month ago

I suspect it's a more niche flavor but I'd be more surprised if they didn't.

[-] alekwithak@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Yes, they trafficked, imprisoned, tortured, raped, farmed, performed rituals with, and ate, both girls and boys. I hesitantly suggest looking into the male victim Sacha Riley's accounts and the released documents yourself because no one benefits from disseminating the information to you. There's a reason the zeitgeist is only focused on certain aspects of the released files. I am a long long time conspiracy theorist and while some of the content has been incredibly ...validating, knowing that at no point was I ever crazy, it has also been massively traumatizing, and I suspect they were released in such a way to impose secondary traumatic stress on the public. All a part of their grooming of society, also heavily outlined in the released documents. Tread lightly, I have been having nightmares every night since I've been reading these.

[-] Colalextrast@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

Holdup. Ate? As in cannibalism? That hasn't been in the news. What document was that in?

[-] alekwithak@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

There's at least one document that outright says it, but they have since removed it (shocking!) it was in batch 11:


You also got a couple of replies with key words to look for. Once you see those in context it's undeniable.

[-] ICastFist@programming.dev 5 points 1 month ago

What the fucking fuck, how is that not being asked around by media?

[-] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago

Because it's uncorroborated and sounds batshit insane?

[-] alekwithak@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Because these very perpetrators own said media and their conglomerates have bought and hollowed out independent outlets.

[-] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 month ago

And you believe this... why? This is an allegation. I don't see any proof here.

[-] paperazzi@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Also look for beef jerky.

[-] OrteilGenou@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Look for cream cheese. Or don't.

this post was submitted on 13 Feb 2026
858 points (99.4% liked)

People Twitter

9785 readers
1053 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician. Archive.is the best way.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS