234
We didn't slaughter our rich...
(hexbear.net)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 13 Feb 2026
234 points (100.0% liked)
Chapotraphouse
14277 readers
688 users here now
Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.
No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer
Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
It's weird that when I say eliminate the rich, I mean take their money away. When Libs hear eliminate the rich they think the only way to do that is murder
The rich as a class will never tolerate the expropriation without escalating to violence. So at some point they force our hand since they will not become equal peacefully
Ok i need to ask: What does this emote mean? I see it and never get it :c
One person says "Nobody is saying that X"
Old Gramps here chimes in "I was saying X"
someone says "i'm not saying X/i wasn't saying X" and you respond "i was saying X
"
This and I also use it interchangeably with
as an emoji for feeling old
Yeah I use it for feeling old because I don’t want to emote Bernie or Chomsky except at their expense
https://youtu.be/5BHuDY8MxUw
I found a YouTube link in your comment. Here are links to the same video on alternative frontends that protect your privacy:
Booourns
You are telling me right after I got us a new woodchipper?
Thing is, they don't have a fundamental problem with the extermination of all members of a class. Everyone celebrates the French revolution
Honestly just have them clean the streets outside their palaces.
I mean... Speaking for myself only... But I wouldn't shed any tears over the elimination of some rich and not just their riches
Oh yeah but the Epstein ones specifically should get scaphism
The issue is that the rich created this horrible world to secure more money and their status. They will never allow you to simply take it away. And even if you do, their children will come looking for it again and will do heinous shit to get it, again.