254

"It is a complicated issue. It is truly a complicated issue, with a wide range of views, truly a wide range of views," Jean-Pierre said. "There is no 'yes or no' answer to this, it is complicated. There is a rule that the Department of Education [DOE] has put forward, and we're going to let that process move forward, and again, we want to make sure that while we establish guardrails with this rule, we also prevent discrimination, as well, against transgender kids. But again, a complicated issue with a wide range of views, and we respect that."

"Absolutely no reason for the Biden admin to do this," New York Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez wrote. "It is indefensible and embarrassing. The admin can still walk this back, and they should. It's a disgrace."

"Honestly, this move by Biden to push a rule on trans kids in sports is not only a backwards betrayal, it [forces] us to have to spend our time dealing with god d*** sports instead of criminal bans on our healthcare," Alejandra Caraballo, a civil rights attorney and LGBTQ+ advocate, wrote. "He could have just done nothing. This is legitimizing transphobia."

The mOsT PrOgReSsIvE Administration in History™ funny-clown-hammer "A complicated issue with a wide range of views, and we respect that" funny-clown-hammer Fuck off out of here with that "centrist" nonsense. There's nothing complicated about it, and it's not an issue unless you want to turn it into one and want to appeal to people's emotions like Republicans are doing. It was only a matter of time before they'd start throwing trans people under the bus. I guess with the coming elections it's as good a time as ever.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] ZoomeristLeninist@hexbear.net 86 points 1 year ago

adding this to the long list of reasons im not voting for biden again when libs ask. my go-to is always “that fucker still owes me $600!”

[-] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

So, you think voting for a Republican or not voting is going to get the job done?

[-] build_a_bear_group@hexbear.net 53 points 1 year ago

So you think that rewarding the Democrats for having the only standard be "Our senile, racist, rapist, corrupt, reactionary war criminal doesn't have an orange spray tan" is going to "get the job done"? Or just the entire party being the polite, norms-respecting Republicans.

[-] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

I think it's the only party that does not vilify LGBTQ people, so I'll keep voting for them for that reason and many others.

[-] build_a_bear_group@hexbear.net 55 points 1 year ago

You're right. They are more of the Uvalde Cops to the Republicans school shooter. Even when they nominally have power they wont even rhetorically fight back, let alone use that power, to defend LGBTQ people in any way.

[-] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

I understand your frustration, but not voting or voting for a Republican will just make matter worse. There's surely room for improvement among Democrats, but it's also the only party with room for improvement.

[-] Catradora_Stalinism@hexbear.net 46 points 1 year ago

but not voting or voting for a Republican will just make matter worse.

Because the democrats have done so fucking much to stop the republicans. Hell, if they get any worse, they could send them a mean letter!

No one here is voting Republican. The fact that you’re including that as a possibility is a massive indication that you don’t understand what we’re on about.

[-] MiguelParenti@hexbear.net 42 points 1 year ago

There's room for improvement? Are you sure? What are you basing that on? It must be vibes cause it sure as fuck doesn't follow with the transphobic statements of brump brandon's handlers.

[-] build_a_bear_group@hexbear.net 39 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

No, ignoring the extremely limited efficacy and right-wing bias of electoralism, their entire point is just being the "Not Republican Party". As long as they can only offer that and nothing else, and still be electorally competitive, they never have to improve and will actively fight against improvement. Additionally, they actually do more to aid the Republicans and right-wing agenda as long as they are really ineffective and out-of-touch and in people's minds voting for them is the only real opposition the Republicans, while constantly capitulating to Republicans on issues like trans rights. But ultimately, this is why the Republicans are much more responsive to what their base wants, since even if they are reactionary, and can somewhat generate the culture war issues, they are the only party offering a positive agenda. (Positive in the sense of a politics of making changes and advancing agendas rather than just saying that the other party is worse. Not saying their agenda is good, obviously)

So, yes, there is some times, particularly on close elections or local elections where you can get improvement by voting Democrat over some Q-anon or MAGA psycho. But you also have to admit, especially with Federal elections, not voting for Democrats is not really making things worse or doing less "harm mitigation" than voting for a Biden, or whatever right-wing bigot the Democrats throw up next. Especially if, even on things like LGBTQ rights, they immediately capitulate and take the Republican position, just with more polite rhetoric.

[-] SoyViking@hexbear.net 26 points 1 year ago

There's plenty of room for improvement to be very diplomatic about it. But you seem to mistake room for improvement with actual improvement. Who cares if the democrats could theoretically do better when they patiently and consistently don't? What good is this void of unrealised improvement doing anybody?

Either you believe that the mere existence of room for improvement is a material gold, which makes no sense. Or you believe that there exists a mechanism for getting the democrats to realise that improvement, a way of pursuing then left. How this is going to work remains a mystery and believing that the democrats will improve tomorrow seems more like a coping mechanism than anything that is likely to actually happen.

[-] combat_brandonism@hexbear.net 53 points 1 year ago

the only party that does not vilify LGBTQ people

might wanna check the OP you're posting on before you.trot that take out there chief

[-] Catradora_Stalinism@hexbear.net 44 points 1 year ago

You guys are unironically basically just as bad as the republicans

as a trans woman, your concern is worthless to me.

but no its the queer people who are wrong on this issue, not you

[-] CyborgMarx@hexbear.net 43 points 1 year ago

What thread do you think you're posting on you dumb fuck?

load more comments (77 replies)
load more comments (78 replies)
this post was submitted on 01 Sep 2023
254 points (99.6% liked)

news

23555 readers
922 users here now

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS