133
AIs can’t stop recommending nuclear strikes in war game simulations
(www.newscientist.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 25 Feb 2026
133 points (99.3% liked)
technology
24272 readers
78 users here now
On the road to fully automated luxury gay space communism.
Spreading Linux propaganda since 2020
- Ways to run Microsoft/Adobe and more on Linux
- The Ultimate FOSS Guide For Android
- Great libre software on Windows
- Hey you, the lib still using Chrome. Read this post!
Rules:
- 1. Obviously abide by the sitewide code of conduct. Bigotry will be met with an immediate ban
- 2. This community is about technology. Offtopic is permitted as long as it is kept in the comment sections
- 3. Although this is not /c/libre, FOSS related posting is tolerated, and even welcome in the case of effort posts
- 4. We believe technology should be liberating. As such, avoid promoting proprietary and/or bourgeois technology
- 5. Explanatory posts to correct the potential mistakes a comrade made in a post of their own are allowed, as long as they remain respectful
- 6. No crypto (Bitcoin, NFT, etc.) speculation, unless it is purely informative and not too cringe
- 7. Absolutely no tech bro shit. If you have a good opinion of Silicon Valley billionaires please manifest yourself so we can ban you.
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
AI does not exist. The Americans are listening to the equivalent of the predictive text algorithm on your phone scaled up by 1 billion.
Well they did purge a few AIs because they started inventing their own language and evolved too fast so yeah i see your point.
I think you need a break from the internet, friend.
https://medium.com/@trezzescience/the-ai-that-invented-its-own-language-and-why-scientists-shut-it-down-aa92c94466bc
This is an ad for facebook's chatbox. I am a computer scientist. The chatboxes pointed at each other are poisoning their own datasets by optimizing for what the average human conversation appears like, but they are no longer talking to humans. Look at the example used in the article.
Without a human involved, the chatbox is useless, as it can't teach itself what is being expected of it. It's essentially """"learning"""" that nonsense is an acceptable output.
I don't want to doubt Mx. @trezzscience, but this is a really funny article. Re-read the nonsense above and tell me youre scared of it.
I don't believe your source is a reliable science communicator, but regardless I'd like to know more about this.
I believe "their own language" is popular miscommunication of the Gibberlink demonstration from February last year where LLMs identify each other and switch to ggwave communication. I don't know of any evidence for models being "purged" as they claim.
https://medium.com/@trezzescience/the-ai-that-invented-its-own-language-and-why-scientists-shut-it-down-aa92c94466bc
https://medium.com/@trezzescience/the-ai-that-invented-its-own-language-and-why-scientists-shut-it-down-aa92c94466bc