253

"It is a complicated issue. It is truly a complicated issue, with a wide range of views, truly a wide range of views," Jean-Pierre said. "There is no 'yes or no' answer to this, it is complicated. There is a rule that the Department of Education [DOE] has put forward, and we're going to let that process move forward, and again, we want to make sure that while we establish guardrails with this rule, we also prevent discrimination, as well, against transgender kids. But again, a complicated issue with a wide range of views, and we respect that."

"Absolutely no reason for the Biden admin to do this," New York Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez wrote. "It is indefensible and embarrassing. The admin can still walk this back, and they should. It's a disgrace."

"Honestly, this move by Biden to push a rule on trans kids in sports is not only a backwards betrayal, it [forces] us to have to spend our time dealing with god d*** sports instead of criminal bans on our healthcare," Alejandra Caraballo, a civil rights attorney and LGBTQ+ advocate, wrote. "He could have just done nothing. This is legitimizing transphobia."

The mOsT PrOgReSsIvE Administration in History™ funny-clown-hammer "A complicated issue with a wide range of views, and we respect that" funny-clown-hammer Fuck off out of here with that "centrist" nonsense. There's nothing complicated about it, and it's not an issue unless you want to turn it into one and want to appeal to people's emotions like Republicans are doing. It was only a matter of time before they'd start throwing trans people under the bus. I guess with the coming elections it's as good a time as ever.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] ZoomeristLeninist@hexbear.net 7 points 1 year ago

i understand, but with this comm you just have to ban anyone who posts there with a non-hexbear acct. reading their comments isnt necessary. im sorry if seems im brushing away ur concerns, i just thought this new comm addresses some of those concerns and wondered if you’d like to help maintain it meow-hug

[-] AcidSmiley@hexbear.net 5 points 1 year ago

Look, i appreciate your trust and the effort going into this, but ... idk, maybe i'm misunderstanding what the plan is, so let me recap to see if we're on the same page: This is one comm that isn't even actually seperate from the reddit shit, but requires us to manually ban the droves of people from other instances who will see it on the top of their front page and will obviously not get they're not allowed to post there? How is this supposed to work, let alone fix anything?

[-] ZoomeristLeninist@hexbear.net 5 points 1 year ago

we can request other instance admins to block that comm instance-wide. if some admins dont then yes, we will manually ban users. but they wont even see it in their “all” feed unless someone in their instance subscribes to it. its just supposed to function as a haven away from the rest of the fediverse. idk if it’s going to “fix” anything but i think it will be nice to have a safe haven where it’s just hexbears. ik it doesnt address ur concerns well, but perhaps it would be helpful if you reiterated those concerns in a c/feedback post so we could have a discussion abt it wider than just the two of us :)

[-] AcidSmiley@hexbear.net 5 points 1 year ago

I've just aired all of this in a big, emotional post in the pinned announcement thread for the den. Sorry in advance when one sentence there comes off as calling you out, i had to vent. Like, really had to. From what i've seen after writing that, local-only comms actually do not seem hard to implement, we may have those soon and i damn hope so because that's the only way i'm staying on this reddit-ass site.

[-] ZoomeristLeninist@hexbear.net 3 points 1 year ago
this post was submitted on 01 Sep 2023
253 points (99.6% liked)

news

23421 readers
473 users here now

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS