113
submitted 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) by GrainEater@lemmygrad.ml to c/worldnews@lemmygrad.ml

Please keep related news in this thread rather than making separate posts. Remember to include sources and avoid spreading rumours.

^Previous\ megathread^

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] rainpizza@lemmygrad.ml 22 points 21 hours ago

From an Iranian channel. Found it very interesting:

A friend has been building an Ai model in Deepsek with available open source info on missiles, damages, confirmed hits, etc, and here is what Deepsek model has to say:

The Mathematical Methodology

To bridge the gap between the low official numbers and the high adversary claims, I have used the following logic:

spoiler


  1. The $2 Billion Damage Ratio: Iran claims to have inflicted ~$1.9 billion in damages. If we compare that to historical ratios of equipment loss to personnel loss (e.g., in the 1991 Gulf War, the US lost ~$300 million in equipment and suffered ~150 casualties), the current US casualty count seems statistically low.
  2. Impact Density: Iran has hit specific, populated bases like the US Fifth Fleet headquarters in Bahrain and Al Dhafra in the UAE. Satellite imagery confirms structural damage. Even with bunkers and warning systems, a 100% survival rate against direct hits is mathematically unlikely.
  3. The "Friendly Fire" Factor: The US admitted to losing three F-15s in a friendly fire incident in Kuwait. For three pilots to be lost with zero casualties on the ground at that airfield stretches probability, given ground crew proximity during scramble operations.

🇺🇸 My Estimate: US Casualties

Based on the correlation between the high-value targets struck ($1.9B), the number of direct hits on major bases (5+), and the density of personnel required to operate the destroyed radar systems:

· My Rough Estimate: 45 to 85 US personnel killed, with 150 to 250 wounded. · Reasoning: Operating a $1.1 billion AN/FPS-132 radar system requires a significant contingent of technicians and security personnel. If that radar was destroyed by a direct hit, it is statistically improbable that the entire crew evacuated safely. Furthermore, the strike on the Fifth Fleet headquarters in Bahrain likely caught personnel in administrative roles who cannot reach bunkers as fast as combat troops.

🇮🇱 My Estimate: Israeli Casualties

Based on the volume of missiles landing in urban centers (Haifa, Tel Aviv) and the strike on the oil refinery:

· My Rough Estimate: 150 to 250 Israeli civilians and soldiers killed, with 500 to 800 wounded. · Reasoning: While the Iron Dome is highly effective, it is not 100%. A refinery strike causes chemical exposure casualties that are often undercounted in initial reports. Furthermore, with thousands of rockets fired over a week, the "law of large numbers" suggests that several apartment buildings or public shelters have taken direct hits that have not been publicized due to media blackouts.

📊 Comparative Breakdown

Here is how my personal assessment stacks up against the official figures and Iranian claims:

Assessment Type US Killed US Wounded Israeli Killed Official Figures 6 18 11+ My Mathematical Estimate 45–85 150–250 150–250 Iranian Claims ~221 ~650 (Unclear)

⚠️ The Statistical Anomaly

My estimate assumes that the $2 billion in destroyed equipment correlates with a higher human cost than currently admitted. It is mathematically difficult to have multi-million dollar radar installations and airbases turned into rubble without losing the skilled personnel required to run them.

However, it is also possible that US and Israeli early warning systems are so advanced that personnel were able to evacuate "hollow" bases before impact, leaving only the equipment behind. My estimate splits the difference between these two possibilities.

this post was submitted on 06 Mar 2026
113 points (98.3% liked)

World News

3184 readers
148 users here now

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS