38

Give me something juicy

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I support Age Verification

(Not to be confused with: I like Age Verification.)

For a few reasons.

    1. The government already has all of your info and is spying on you from any device with a camera or microphone and wireless connection and without a warrant or meaningful accountability. We know this objectively because the FBI, desperate to look competent, inadvertently publicized footage obtained illegally in the Guthrie case that shouldn't have existed.
    1. It's not 2014. We have enough information now to know definitively that social media (and increasingly, use of LLM's) is harmful to children's mental health, and that its negative effects are more pronounced on developing brains. (Though they affect adults as well.) These systems harm a person's mental health and cognitive abilities, and while this bit is anecdotal, I know several teachers who struggle to teach kids because they're no longer able to focus on anything for more than sixty seconds. (And the question: "Why do I have to know this if an AI can do it for me?" is becoming a common refrain.)
    1. Private entities also already have your data. Go look yourself up on spokeo.com or some other background check site if you don't think so. (And be sure to put in a request there to have your info deleted while you're at it.) Or sub to a deletion service that will remove it for you.
    1. People say that to cut kids off from social media will isolate them, but I grew up in a world where we only had email, chat rooms, snail mail, and land lines, and somehow we magically made friendly connections anyway. It's a nonsense argument, and ignores that social media itself is isolating people to a much greater extent.

Essentially, I think Age Verification is the lesser of two huge evils, and I don't expect the government in my country to force social media companies to disclose and change their algorithms to eliminate the harm being done to kids, so Age Verification becomes a necessary evil. (Hopefully a short-term one, but we'll see.) The social media companies have too much money for any civil suit to meaningfully impact them financially.

[-] greenskye@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 week ago

I'm not against age verification as a concept. But I don't think the current solutions will actually protect children. They are simply a further attack on privacy. We will have less privacy and our kids will still be just as unsafe as before.

And I give it less than 6 months before this data is used for something other than protecting kids. It's absolutely just going to be used to target LGBT content or something.

[-] railway692@piefed.zip 7 points 1 week ago

Upvoted because it is a controversial take.

My problem with age verification is that what we're being sold is not what we're going to get.

"Choosing the lesser of two evils" implies that only two options exist. When the same companies are responsible for both evils, we should be talking alternatives, not letting them make us decide between getting punched in the face and giving up our lunch money to make it stop.

[-] ageedizzle@piefed.ca 2 points 1 week ago

If not one of these two evils, then what's the third option?

[-] railway692@piefed.zip 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

My reply here.

Tl;dr:

  • Support decentralized alternatives*
  • Exercise parental controls on-device and IRL
  • Teach the children what we learned

It's not a magic bullet, but it's better than putting the Epstein class in charge of protecting the children.

*Obviously, there are cesspools on the Fediverse, too. But we're incentivized and empowered to curate and to moderate these spaces, in ways that we're not on Twitter.

[-] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

There is no 'we' in your hypothetical, unless you're sitting on a billionaire fortune or a member of the Epstein class.

The only power you or I have is local, and this is a national problem.

[-] railway692@piefed.zip 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

There is no 'we' in your hypothetical

We is everyone that isn't those companies and is impacted by social media.

The only power you or I have is local, and this is a national problem.

We do have little power on a national level, but that doesn't mean the only power we have is local.

Sure, we can't ~~flip a switch~~ tell the engineers to program a switch and flip it for us like Musk and Zuckerberg can, but that's not the only power that matters.

We can build and support alternatives to addictive, enshittified centralized tech (like the Fediverse). I was offered the "choice" of accepting a degraded Twitter experience or paying for Twitter premium. I chose to check out Mastodon.

We can use the parental controls we do have, both inside the ecosystem and in the real world. No screens in the bedroom or at the dinner table. No smartphone until you're 16. Schools that ban phones in the classroom. Venues that ban phones during shows.

Edit: Another option is educating ourselves and our children to be safe on the internet. I had to learn that the correct response to "what are you wearing" is "a robe and wizard hat" and then blocking the pedophile all on my own because my parents didn't know those threats even existed. I do. Most parents in 2026 do.

I'm not imaginative, but we have a lot more power than just choosing between "let it suck forever" and "give up even more of your privacy and I'll pretend to fix the problems I created/encouraged because I make more money that way."

[-] ageedizzle@piefed.ca 2 points 1 week ago

Go look yourself up on spokeo.com

I looked at my email and it says I'm some random lady who I've never met. What should I make of this?

[-] radiouser@crazypeople.online 1 points 1 week ago

Same here. Looked up an old email and it wasn't my name lol. Good news I guess?

this post was submitted on 02 Mar 2026
38 points (93.2% liked)

Ask Lemmy

38430 readers
653 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, toxicity and dog-whistling are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS