36

Give me something juicy

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 week ago

Stupid people exist.

I mean this actively: stupid people aren't theoretical brings who exist outside this discussion we are having here. Many people in this thread qualify. There's regular stupid, which is just most people. That's the benign kind of stupid which maybe is indicative of a lack of training or bad circumstances for learning in earlier life. You can also find double down stupid in this thread. The flat earth conspiracy, "consciousness" mysticism, and can barely craft a sentence kind of stupid.

The general public is even worse.

People are all willing to admit that stupid exists, but most won't point the finger. Close your eyes and point and you'll hit someone, bless their hearts.

[-] a_gee_dizzle@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 week ago

stupid people aren’t theoretical brings who exist outside this discussion we are having here. Many people in this thread qualify

I agree you're pretty stupid

[-] dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

As long as you agree I guess.

Edit:

For some fun, do you care to attempt to justify your position? I suspect you may be ill-equipped, but I'm happy to let you prove it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Norin@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago

Somewhere around the majority of people employed in academia are absolutely useless.

I say this as an academic.

[-] ageedizzle@piefed.ca 11 points 1 week ago

I wanted to pursue academia until I met academics. I realized it was all dick measuring contests and covert social signalling. To get ahead you to understand the unspoken and political rules. It was a very disheartening realization. I didn’t have the heart to stomach it so I ended up pursuing a different career path

[-] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

When I was in art school our TA's were making 20k a year but stilling on 50k - 100k in student debt. They'd all been to bigger, more prestigious art schools, and they were barely getting by. And each of these schools was churning out hundreds or thousands of students every year.

That convinced me to take a different direction in life. Glad I did. I'm still a working artist and make a good living with it as a side hustle, but I'm glad I don't have to live with the uncertainty.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 week ago

It aint just academia.

[-] snooggums@piefed.world 18 points 1 week ago

Being mtf or ftm trans is conforming to gender stereotypes with extra steps. Abolishing gender stereotypes and letting everyone express themselves however they want would be far better for society overall.

I don't mean that in a negative way and fully support respecting self identification because that has the best outcomes in the real world.

[-] turboSnail@piefed.europe.pub 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I've also thought about that a bit. The way I see it, transgender people definitely are following local cultural terms. Not the ones that they are expected to follow, but still.

What's considered masculine or feminine isn't standard across different cultural contexts either. For example, wearing skirts or pink aren't exclusively feminine. In a western context they currently are, so that's why western MTFs are currently inclined to wear those.

However, that wasn't always the case. If the same person had been born a few centuries ago, pink would not have meant the same thing, and they they would have probably felt differently about that color. Also, what westerners would consider a skirt these days, can be a masculine or gender neutral piece of clothing in other cultures. Even today, there are place where mean wear something that westerners would call a skirt.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 week ago

Apartments and big cities are hell. People shouldn't be shoved together like sardines.

[-] FinjaminPoach@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

You're probably exactly right for the places you're thinking of, but neither of those things have to be hell. Apartments originally were spacious places like the home-sized ones, the justification for their existence being that you get to live in the city centre rather than that being the only selling point.

If you want to see good examples of big cities with nice levels of public space, look at urban design in south korea and china

[-] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago

What do you do when your population outpaces your land mass?

[-] user224@lemmy.sdf.org 13 points 1 week ago

Following "if it isn't harmful, it's not a problem" as a guideline, incest isn't immoral if it doesn't involve large power imbalance (e.g.: parent and offspring) and doesn't produce offspring.
If the relationship, be it purely romantic or otherwise is mutually desired and fully consensual (usual requirements), then I don't see how it would be different from other non-standard relationships.

I hope that's plenty controversial.

[-] Solumbran@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

If the two individuals aged for a significant part of their lives together, offsprings are not the only "harm".

Forming relationships with people that are different (as in, not relatives) helps avoid the bad parts of the family structure (the weird beliefs, opinions, behaviours, etc, that are taught within a family but are not accepted outside of it). Without that, you can end up with something that seems like "cultural inbreeding" where the weirdness persists and grows, until it reaches weird shit.


On a side note

Arguably a similar effect already happens in western countries thanks to xenophobia, and that's why you have people that care so much about transmitting their DNA and having their own biological kids as if it mattered. This is just the remnants of a deeply racist culture that believes that you need to preserve your family line, and with it, your DNA. If people were mixing more with other cultures and origins, this would seem much more absurd.

[-] definitely_AI@feddit.online 4 points 1 week ago

Forming relationships with people that are different (as in, not relatives) helps avoid the bad parts of the family structure

That is an argument from utility, which can most certainly be debated. What constitutes "bad"? That is a subjective interpretation.

where the weirdness persists and grows, until it reaches weird shit.

And how do we define "weird shit"? Are "normal" relationships not "weird shit" and don't they lead to "weird shit"?

their DNA and having their own biological kids as if it mattered.

Well, it matters to them. Therefore, it matters. Doesn't it? It does to them.

Genuinely just poking at arguments here, I have no decided opinion either way.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[-] Nemo@slrpnk.net 9 points 1 week ago

No state that is in the Eastern Time Zone is a part of the Midwest.

[-] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 week ago

Pennsylvania I could give you, but Ohio and Michigan? I guess it depends on what Midwest means to you, but as a cultural identity I would strongly disagree. But hey, that's why we're in the thread, right?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] moakley@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

Plastic straw pollution doesn't have a measurable impact on the environment.

The entire thing about banning plastic straws comes from some high schooler using back-of-a-napkin math to guess how many straws are in the ocean in what was clearly a successful attempt at starting a science fair project the night before it was due. Some news station picked it up, and then a bunch of science-illiterates ran away with it.

You can't determine the impact of pollution by count. Straws are tiny and weigh almost nothing. If you skip buying one pair of sneakers in your life, then you've successfully reduced your plastic use by almost a lifetime of plastic straws.

Removing plastic straws is probably the single least impactful way to reduce plastic pollution. It's pure virtue signaling: it's about presenting an image of being environmentally conscious while doing effectively nothing to help the environment.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I support Age Verification

(Not to be confused with: I like Age Verification.)

For a few reasons.

    1. The government already has all of your info and is spying on you from any device with a camera or microphone and wireless connection and without a warrant or meaningful accountability. We know this objectively because the FBI, desperate to look competent, inadvertently publicized footage obtained illegally in the Guthrie case that shouldn't have existed.
    1. It's not 2014. We have enough information now to know definitively that social media (and increasingly, use of LLM's) is harmful to children's mental health, and that its negative effects are more pronounced on developing brains. (Though they affect adults as well.) These systems harm a person's mental health and cognitive abilities, and while this bit is anecdotal, I know several teachers who struggle to teach kids because they're no longer able to focus on anything for more than sixty seconds. (And the question: "Why do I have to know this if an AI can do it for me?" is becoming a common refrain.)
    1. Private entities also already have your data. Go look yourself up on spokeo.com or some other background check site if you don't think so. (And be sure to put in a request there to have your info deleted while you're at it.) Or sub to a deletion service that will remove it for you.
    1. People say that to cut kids off from social media will isolate them, but I grew up in a world where we only had email, chat rooms, snail mail, and land lines, and somehow we magically made friendly connections anyway. It's a nonsense argument, and ignores that social media itself is isolating people to a much greater extent.

Essentially, I think Age Verification is the lesser of two huge evils, and I don't expect the government in my country to force social media companies to disclose and change their algorithms to eliminate the harm being done to kids, so Age Verification becomes a necessary evil. (Hopefully a short-term one, but we'll see.) The social media companies have too much money for any civil suit to meaningfully impact them financially.

[-] greenskye@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 week ago

I'm not against age verification as a concept. But I don't think the current solutions will actually protect children. They are simply a further attack on privacy. We will have less privacy and our kids will still be just as unsafe as before.

And I give it less than 6 months before this data is used for something other than protecting kids. It's absolutely just going to be used to target LGBT content or something.

[-] railway692@piefed.zip 7 points 1 week ago

Upvoted because it is a controversial take.

My problem with age verification is that what we're being sold is not what we're going to get.

"Choosing the lesser of two evils" implies that only two options exist. When the same companies are responsible for both evils, we should be talking alternatives, not letting them make us decide between getting punched in the face and giving up our lunch money to make it stop.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] CodenameDarlen@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Human beings should stop reproducing and walk towards extinction, we've done enough and irreparable damage to the nature

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] greenskye@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 week ago

People have gotten way too comfortable with censoring speech. I understand the fight against intolerance and propaganda and how hopeless that fight can feel, but we've sometimes taken things too far and that's only going to hurt us in the end. The left is not going to be the one that will take these compromises to the limit. We will be the most hurt by every bit of erosion we allowed to happen.

Specifically, I'm referring to efforts to get right wing platforms taken down not by being banned by a Facebook or Twitter or something, but by attacking the infrastructure on which a right wing website it run (such as attempts to get Truth social shut down by going after AWS, ISPs and other basic Internet infrastructure). It's a similar approach as is sometimes done when they target payment processors and trying to shame them into banning these platforms from processing payments.

These types of attacks on speech should never be allowed no matter if it's the left or the right. We can ban people from our private business or gathering place, but we shouldn't be able to stop them from creating their own. And no, basic Internet infrastructure shouldn't get to play the 'private business' card. They are effectively the roads, utilities and other generic infrastructure of the digital age.

Those attacks are no different from the right's constant attacks on abortion clinics by attempting to subject them to needless and pointless regulations meant for full hospitals. Or as if we'd allowed a water company to start selectively shutting off water to places they don't like.

We need more protections for the neutrality of infrastructure (both physical and digital) and keep the fights firmly restricted to end user platforms. Lest we find that someday our enemies have taken these tactics and beat us with them with far greater ruthlessness than we'd ever use.

[-] lemmyseikai@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

I both thing people have a right to dignity, which by extension means they should have a day of how to live their lives. I also think that the general population shouldn't vote. Against Democracy is a really good read if you haven't read it.

For the record, I literally will drive people to the polls (since our current system creates better outcomes if more people vote) but I do really wish that most of them wouldn't XD.

[-] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Okay so i haven't read against democracy but it seems to take the socrates position. Instead of limiting votes to only the highly educated (which i take as an issue because this disadvantages the poor significantly due to higher education costing lots of money) why not just build a society in which everyone is educated enough to meet the standard for an informed voting population?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Novamdomum@fedia.io 5 points 1 week ago

I've got a few that I can't really separate:

Dental hygienists are greedy charlatans who convince us we need an expensive hygiene appointment every six months when we really don't. That used to be true before the invention of the electric toothbrush but not now. I stopped going 7 years ago and I make sure I brush properly daily for two minutes with my electric toothbrush. I occasionally use inter-dental brushes for a deeper clean and my teeth are perfect. No soreness, gum bleeding and certainly no cavities. It's lies I tell ya.

AI is the most incredible development in human evolution since the invention of the wheel. I think it is the beginning of our next evolutionary step. It may even save us from destroying ourselves. It has brought me personally incredible results that have enriched my life in countless ways. I can't wait to see where it takes us. People who are angry about it are dumb (you did say "controversial opinion" lol).

Money is basically the ring from Lord of the rings. You can't have it without it changing you. I've had the dubious pleasure of knowing a great many millionaires and they're all miserable bastards pretending that they're not. Their families hate them, most of them are alcoholics and drug addicts. They hate themselves even more and their money doesn't mean anything to them so they use it to impress others or hurt them, just so they can feel something. It's all a disgustingly wasteful, tragic act.

[-] greenskye@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 week ago

Money is basically the ring from Lord of the rings.

I'll still stick with my (perhaps naive) belief that people still have this backwards. Wealth is not magically corruptive like the ring was. Rather only people who are already problematic will end up with the sorts of wealth that it takes to be labeled as one of those rich assholes. They aren't assholes cause they're rich, they're rich because they were assholes.

The system (and human society in general) rewards the worst of us with wealth. However, if you short circuit this process and give a good person wealth, you'll find that a) they don't magically become an asshole and b) they probably don't stay rich for very long. Typically because they've given most of it away as they don't need it and don't define themselves by having it.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] esc27@piefed.social 3 points 1 week ago

You should always look in the oven before turning it on.

Seems simple to me. Before making the oven hot, make sure there's nothing in there you don't want to get hot (and that the racks are in the right place.) Takes maybe a second.

But a lot of people seem to find the idea that they (or anyone in their household) would ever leave something in the oven, when not cooking, to be deeply offensive.

[-] HubertManne@piefed.social 3 points 1 week ago

im fine with trans people and non discrimination but my whole life sex and gender terms were one and the same for me and most folks in everyday language. The idea of identifying pronouns for myself seems laughable to me. Im a big believer in simple solutions. Got some temp work at a place with genderless bathrooms that had the full floor to ceiling doors. Its a bit wierd to wash my hands with girls but its not like im naked. There is all sorts of language things going out of fashion (online) and folks are like just learn it but look despite decades of school my spelling and grammar are atrocious because habits don't change easily and no one is even forcing me to study or anything now. On top of it, like it or not for the internet folks, it has no bearing in the outside world which is still basically jugging along at its own pace. It will over time for sure but it won't happen as quickly as early adopters would like. Also I pretty much don't like any type of censorship of fictinoal things. Reality and fiction are two different things to me. Although modern ability to fake things is making identifying something as real as tough. I don't want claims of it being high end fakes as letting folks get away with crimes.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] DoubleDongle@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Armor-piercing ammunition should never be banned.

[-] FinjaminPoach@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Hmm, why do you believe that then? So that people can defend themselves against the police better?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago

You really want one?

Okay:

Race-Based Affirmative Action is harmful discrimination against Asians and I, as an Asian American, don't really like it, particularly in the context of it being used as a deciding factor in college admissions.

(Affirmative action based on other factors like income or disability is fine, but using race is kinda weird to me... too arbitrary)

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] _NetNomad@fedia.io 2 points 1 week ago

to me, the Super Nintendo was the worst Nintendo console. so much of the library is games that either had better NES prequels or N64 sequels if not both. despite having a buttload more colors than the Mega Drive, so many of the games ended up looking bland and lifeless, with the notable exception of Super Mario World which looks like a Fisher Price product. the sound chip sounds like someone is sitting on it, and that washed out sound is admittedly nice for RPGs but it ruins everything else

and this isn't me being a bitter SEGA fan! i think the NES and the GameCube were both signifigantly better than their SEGA contemporaries. just considering Nintendo consoles, i rank the Super well below the Wii U and Virtual Boy- those at least offered unique experiences

[-] Quilotoa@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago

It takes just as much faith to believe that the universe came into existence out of nothing as it does to believe a higher being created it.

[-] ageedizzle@piefed.ca 2 points 1 week ago

I agree. Though I still think if God is real hes kind of an asshole lmao. Like why butthole cancer, man? Couldn't you have just not created that?

Probably because of something related to butthole development, lol, or cell growth in general. Perhaps it was unavoidable in the way God wanted to fashion us and the world. And it is not a perfect place but, if it weren't for our own disunion and ignorance, it would be so much better. Imagine if we only had to contend with accidental deaths, medical issues and natural disasters...

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] toomanypancakes@piefed.world 2 points 1 week ago

There's no ethical way to kill someone who's done nothing to you and doesn't want to die.

[-] greenskye@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 week ago

I feel like 'done nothing to you' is too vague here.

If someone is currently attempting to murder my child is that 'nothing to me' or is emotional harm considered?

If someone is attacking a stranger in front of me is that 'nothing to me' or is the trauma of seeing another human attacked considered 'doing something to me'

If someone is systematically committing genocide of a people not related to me in anyway (and it's fully provable) is that 'nothing to me' or is it an affront to human decency and therefore count as harm to myself as a fellow human.

Basically there's a million ways to justify someone has harmed you.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 02 Mar 2026
36 points (92.9% liked)

Ask Lemmy

38430 readers
553 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, toxicity and dog-whistling are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS