154

A reminder that as the US continues to threaten countries around the world, fedposting is to be very much avoided (even with qualifiers like "in Minecraft") and comments containing it will be removed.

Image is of Iranian missiles in one of their many fortified underground facilities. I sincerely hope this isn't AI generated, because I'm very wary of posting footage of explosions or combat and having it later turn out to be fake.


Now that the initial shock of the war's beginning is over and there's a meaningful dataset to analyze, the takes from the many hundreds of Geopolitics Understanders are flying in, with predictably extreme variance about how long they predict this war to last and who will ultimately be the victor - and, indeed, what victory even looks like for either side. There are some who are already toasting to their side's victory, but most serious analysts seem to believe that if there isn't any negotiations, and it's just attrition to the death, then it's gonna be a long war (months or even years), and then, depending on the analyst, either the US or Iran then concedes defeat.

All of these takes are being informed by quite possibly the worst information environment yet conceived by humanity. There's the usual stuff: falsehoods, lying by omission, wild exaggerations, state propaganda, doctored videos, masses of bots boosting certain narratives, etc - but now also easily accessible AI which creates images and videos that can be quite convincing unless further inspected by tools online, and people claiming that some non-AI videos were made with AI. On top of all of that, censorship across the Middle East is now in full effect, spawning arguments about whether Iran's strikes have actually decreased in intensity (and if they have, then why), or if we just aren't seeing them as much on social media anymore. Scant footage here and there confirms that strikes are still happening, but I suspect that most of the evidence of further damage to Western facilities will either be satellite imagery or indirect indicators like rescue crews gathering in certain areas, as well as the he-said-she-said of official statements by either side. Given the West's utter lack of reliability with reporting... well, pretty much everything, but especially the Ukraine War, I know which side I'm predisposed to believe, but obviously Iran's government generally isn't going to report successful strikes by Western forces for a myriad reasons.

However, the military conflict is being gradually eclipsed in importance by the growing likelihood of a global economic crisis of massive proportions. A very large proportion of the fuel that keeps the world running is now not moving, and may remain so for weeks or months. Some are even predicting that 2026 will be the year of the biggest energy crisis in world history, dwarfing the crisis of 1973, as countries around the world begin to restrict oil and gas exports and tap into limited reserves. In such a situation, Iran clearly holds all the cards, because even if the US eventually achieves air supremacy, it is still relatively trivial to fire cheap drones en masse at tankers in the strait and at oil facilities throughout the Gulf. Assuming that Iran and the US do not negotiate, then even if the US eventually somehow wins and can reopen the strait within a few months, the global economic and political situation may be so degraded that the victory will be pyrrhic.


Last week's thread is here.
The Imperialism Reading Group is here.

Please check out the RedAtlas!

The bulletins site is here. Currently not used.
The RSS feed is here. Also currently not used.

The Zionist Entity's Genocide of Palestine

If you have evidence of Zionist crimes and atrocities that you wish to preserve, there is a thread here in which to do so.

Sources on the fighting in Palestine against the temporary Zionist entity. In general, CW for footage of battles, explosions, dead people, and so on:

UNRWA reports on the Zionists' destruction and siege of Gaza and the West Bank.

English-language Palestinian Marxist-Leninist twitter account. Alt here.
English-language twitter account that collates news.
Arab-language twitter account with videos and images of fighting.
English-language (with some Arab retweets) Twitter account based in Lebanon. - Telegram is @IbnRiad.
English-language Palestinian Twitter account which reports on news from the Resistance Axis. - Telegram is @EyesOnSouth.
English-language Twitter account in the same group as the previous two. - Telegram here.

Mirrors of Telegram channels that have been erased by Zionist censorship.

Russia-Ukraine Conflict

Examples of Ukrainian Nazis and fascists
Examples of racism/euro-centrism during the Russia-Ukraine conflict

Sources:

Defense Politics Asia's youtube channel and their map. Their youtube channel has substantially diminished in quality but the map is still useful.
Moon of Alabama, which tends to have interesting analysis. Avoid the comment section.
Understanding War and the Saker: reactionary sources that have occasional insights on the war.
Alexander Mercouris, who does daily videos on the conflict. While he is a reactionary and surrounds himself with likeminded people, his daily update videos are relatively brainworm-free and good if you don't want to follow Russian telegram channels to get news. He also co-hosts The Duran, which is more explicitly conservative, racist, sexist, transphobic, anti-communist, etc when guests are invited on, but is just about tolerable when it's just the two of them if you want a little more analysis.
Simplicius, who publishes on Substack. Like others, his political analysis should be soundly ignored, but his knowledge of weaponry and military strategy is generally quite good.
On the ground: Patrick Lancaster, an independent and very good journalist reporting in the warzone on the separatists' side.

Unedited videos of Russian/Ukrainian press conferences and speeches.

Pro-Russian Telegram Channels:

Again, CW for anti-LGBT and racist, sexist, etc speech, as well as combat footage.

https://t.me/aleksandr_skif ~ DPR's former Defense Minister and Colonel in the DPR's forces. Russian language.
https://t.me/Slavyangrad ~ A few different pro-Russian people gather frequent content for this channel (~100 posts per day), some socialist, but all socially reactionary. If you can only tolerate using one Russian telegram channel, I would recommend this one.
https://t.me/s/levigodman ~ Does daily update posts.
https://t.me/patricklancasternewstoday ~ Patrick Lancaster's telegram channel.
https://t.me/gonzowarr ~ A big Russian commentator.
https://t.me/rybar ~ One of, if not the, biggest Russian telegram channels focussing on the war out there. Actually quite balanced, maybe even pessimistic about Russia. Produces interesting and useful maps.
https://t.me/epoddubny ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/boris_rozhin ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/mod_russia_en ~ Russian Ministry of Defense. Does daily, if rather bland updates on the number of Ukrainians killed, etc. The figures appear to be approximately accurate; if you want, reduce all numbers by 25% as a 'propaganda tax', if you don't believe them. Does not cover everything, for obvious reasons, and virtually never details Russian losses.
https://t.me/UkraineHumanRightsAbuses ~ Pro-Russian, documents abuses that Ukraine commits.

Pro-Ukraine Telegram Channels:

Almost every Western media outlet.
https://discord.gg/projectowl ~ Pro-Ukrainian OSINT Discord.
https://t.me/ice_inii ~ Alleged Ukrainian account with a rather cynical take on the entire thing.


you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] thethirdgracchi@hexbear.net 113 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Trump: We have already figured out the Strait of Hormuz. We have knocked out their Navy. When you knock out the Navy, they can't do what they want to do.

he doesn't know chefs-kiss he-laughed

Like for real has nobody told him that Iran's ability to close the Strait has nothing to with their navy and everything to do with the fact that it's tiny and they have a shit ton of missiles right next to it? Ansarallah does not have a navy and never did, yet the Bab el Mandeb Strait remained closed for like two years. Is this intentionally ridiculous? Does he even know he's lying?

Source: CNN

[-] supafuzz@hexbear.net 66 points 2 weeks ago

yes sir you're absolutely right sir, now send the carrier groups through it so that the tankers feel reassured

[-] miz@hexbear.net 58 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I assume he's lying to reassure the capital markets, but they aren't stupid enough to believe this

[remembers Elon] wait maybe they are

[-] Lovely_sombrero@hexbear.net 42 points 2 weeks ago

Some of "they" are stupid, some of "they" aren't, but this is mostly for the automated trading algos that pick up the news.

[-] supafuzz@hexbear.net 40 points 2 weeks ago

prompt-injecting the market manipulation bots, awesome

[-] Lovely_sombrero@hexbear.net 30 points 2 weeks ago

He who controls the Bloomberg terminal controls the pump-and-dump machine.

[-] Sodium_nitride@lemmygrad.ml 37 points 2 weeks ago
[-] tidalwave@hexbear.net 25 points 2 weeks ago

To answer this question I need to revisit some core aspects of Marx’s thought, specifically his theory of economic value, but from a new perspective, that of control theory.

Control theory really is a gateway drug

[-] Infamousblt@hexbear.net 27 points 2 weeks ago

Unfortunately for him what matters isn't his opinion or even Iran's opinion, it's the insurance companies that insured these shippers. If they won't insure boats that cross, boats ain't gonna cross, regardless of anything else going on

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml 37 points 2 weeks ago

Also, it has more to do with insurance than Iran's actual force projection.

The only way the US could maybe reopen the Strait is if they backstopped all insurance with direct government funding.

[-] john_brown@hexbear.net 38 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

The only way the US could maybe reopen the Strait is if they backstopped all insurance with direct government funding.

https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/us-considering-oil-tanker-insurance-support-ease-middle-east-crude-shipments-2026-03-03/

The U.S. Navy could begin escorting oil tankers through the Strait of ​Hormuz if necessary, President Donald Trump said on Tuesday, adding he had ordered the U.S. International Development Finance Corporation to provide political risk insurance and ‌financial guarantees for maritime trade in the Gulf.

joker-amerikkklap

[-] D61@hexbear.net 26 points 2 weeks ago

Waiting for the insurance companies to start selling insurance for when the "USA Insurance" department starts rejecting claims.

[-] facow@hexbear.net 21 points 2 weeks ago

The tankers will need their doctors to get them pre-approval before crossing the strait

[-] aanes_appreciator@hexbear.net 11 points 2 weeks ago

Americans got universal boatcare before universal healthcare

[-] coolusername@hexbear.net 33 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

i don't see how that helps. it just means they take even more of a hit as now they're liable for a high value of goods that will have to be discarded after every ship is set on fire. also, i don't think tanker captains and crew are suicidal.

[-] supafuzz@hexbear.net 36 points 2 weeks ago

yeah. "can't boss, insurance" is the excuse, "I don't want to get my ass blown up" is the reason

Iran can keep the whole region locked down indefinitely for the price of one drone per airport per day and a couple for anybody who dips a toe into the strait

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml 33 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Right now, Iran doesn't have to set every ship on fire. The mere threat that they could has paralyzed the insurers.

If the insurance was backed by the US they could eat the risk for the sake of keeping shipping open. Iran would be forced to attack every ship, and that would be unsustainable. Then again, like I said, that only maybe reopens the Strait. It's like you said, crews would mutiny if they all knew any voyage could be their last.

[-] marxisthayaca@hexbear.net 2 points 2 weeks ago

They don’t have to attack every ship. Reducing traffic by 60-80% can still be disruptive. And worst comes to worst, mine the strait.

[-] D61@hexbear.net 22 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Cargo ships don't set sail without insurance. If the USA says straight up, "We'll insure your ship and cargo through the Straight while the war is ongoing," ships will get underway.

Now... what shipping company is going to be willing to risk the USA government turning around and saying, "Nah, we changed our mind. Ain't paying for shit," after their ships start sailing.

Also, they are large and slow. Much smaller munitions/drones can be deployed to hit the command deck, engines, or punch a hole at the water line that will limit the loss of life to the crew. (Pretty sure container ships have a surprisingly small number of crew compared to the size of the vessel.)

[-] thethirdgracchi@hexbear.net 15 points 2 weeks ago

If the USA says straight up, "We'll insure your ship and cargo through the Straight while the war is ongoing," ships will get underway.

They literally did this. Still no takers. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/3/3/us-will-provide-insurance-for-ships-in-gulf-amid-iranian-attacks-trump

[-] spectre@hexbear.net 12 points 2 weeks ago

The headlines I saw these past two days were the US offering insurance and escorts, and no ships accepting the offer (so far?)

[-] thethirdgracchi@hexbear.net 12 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah they did (backstopping insurance) this but no company is willing to take them up on the backstop offer, because they know that Iran can still blow their ship up and they don't wanna risk not getting paid by Trump.

this post was submitted on 06 Mar 2026
154 points (100.0% liked)

news

24684 readers
925 users here now

Welcome to c/news! We aim to foster a book-club type environment for discussion and critical analysis of the news. Our policy objectives are:

We ask community members to appreciate the uncertainty inherent in critical analysis of current events, the need to constantly learn, and take part in the community with humility. None of us are the One True Leftist, not even you, the reader.

Newcomm and Newsmega Rules:

The Hexbear Code of Conduct and Terms of Service apply here.

  1. Link titles: Please use informative link titles. Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed.

  2. Content warnings: Posts on the newscomm and top-level replies on the newsmega should use content warnings appropriately. Please be thoughtful about wording and triggers when describing awful things in post titles.

  3. Fake news: No fake news posts ever, including April 1st. Deliberate fake news posting is a bannable offense. If you mistakenly post fake news the mod team may ask you to delete/modify the post or we may delete it ourselves.

  4. Link sources: All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. If you are citing a Twitter post as news, please include the Xcancel.com (or another Nitter instance) or at least strip out identifier information from the twitter link. There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance, such as Libredirect or archive them as you would any other reactionary source.

  5. Archive sites: We highly encourage use of non-paywalled archive sites (i.e. archive.is, web.archive.org, ghostarchive.org) so that links are widely accessible to the community and so that reactionary sources don’t derive data/ad revenue from Hexbear users. If you see a link without an archive link, please archive it yourself and add it to the thread, ask the OP to fix it, or report to mods. Including text of articles in threads is welcome.

  6. Low effort material: Avoid memes/jokes/shitposts in newscomm posts and top-level replies to the newsmega. This kind of content is OK in post replies and in newsmega sub-threads. We encourage the community to balance their contribution of low effort material with effort posts, links to real news/analysis, and meaningful engagement with material posted in the community.

  7. American politics: Discussion and effort posts on the (potential) material impacts of American electoral politics is welcome, but the never-ending circus of American Politics© Brought to You by Mountain Dew™ is not welcome. This refers to polling, pundit reactions, electoral horse races, rumors of who might run, etc.

  8. Electoralism: Please try to avoid struggle sessions about the value of voting/taking part in the electoral system in the West. c/electoralism is right over there.

  9. AI Slop: Don't post AI generated content. Posts about AI race/chip wars/data centers are fine.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS